Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604585›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2023

The Impact of Chromosomal Rearrangements in Speciation: From Micro- to Macroevolution.

Kay Lucek, Mabel D Giménez, Mathieu Joron, Marina Rafajlović, Jeremy B Searle, Nora Walden, Anja Marie Westram, Rui Faria

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Chromosomal inversions and their impact on insect evolution.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Dynamics of karyotype evolution.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 10 countries.

Kay LucekBiodiversity Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland kay.lucek@unine.ch ruifaria@cibio.up.pt.
Mabel D GiménezConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Genética Humana de Misiones (IGeHM), Parque de la Salud de la Provincia de Misiones "Dr. Ramón Madariaga," N3300KAZ Posadas, Misiones, Argentina.
Mathieu JoronCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, 34293 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-4147
Marina RafajlovićDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2177-4622
Jeremy B SearleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Nora WaldenCentre for Organismal Studies, University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Anja Marie WestramInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA), 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Rui FariaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado; kay.lucek@unine.ch ruifaria@cibio.up.pt.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCornell University · USHeidelberg University · DEInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements (CRs) have been known since almost the beginning of genetics. While an important role for CRs in speciation has been suggested, evidence primarily stems from theoretical and empirical studies focusing on the microevolutionary level (i.e., on taxon pairs where speciation is often incomplete). Although the role of CRs in eukaryotic speciation at a macroevolutionary level has been supported by associations between species diversity and rates of evolution of CRs across phylogenies, these findings are limited to a restricted range of CRs and taxa. Now that more broadly applicable and precise CR detection approaches have become available, we address the challenges in filling some of the conceptual and empirical gaps between micro- and macroevolutionary studies on the role of CRs in speciation. We synthesize what is known about the macroevolutionary impact of CRs and suggest new research avenues to overcome the pitfalls of previous studies to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the evolutionary significance of CRs in speciation across the tree of life.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic SpeciationPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37604585
PMCPMC10626258
OpenAlexW4386026302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.