Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604474›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

Preferences of Patients and Providers in High-Burden Malaria Settings for Long-Acting Malaria Chemoprevention.

Kimberly K Scarsi, Harlan Sayles, Kelvin Kapungu, Peter Sifuna, Matthew M Ippolito, Renae Furl, Matthew J Anderson, Joelle Dountio Ofimboudem, Gershom Chongwe, Jack Hutter and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kimberly K ScarsiCollege of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Harlan SaylesCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Kelvin KapunguDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Ndola, Zambia.
Peter SifunaKombewa Clinical Research Center, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa (USAMRD-A), Kisumu, Kenya.
Matthew M IppolitoDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Renae FurlCollege of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Matthew J AndersonCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Joelle Dountio OfimboudemTreatment Action Group, New York, New York.
Gershom ChongweTropical Diseases Research Centre, Ndola, Zambia.
Jack HutterKombewa Clinical Research Center, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa (USAMRD-A), Kisumu, Kenya.
Steven P RannardDepartment of Chemistry, Centre of Excellence in Long-Acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Andrew OwenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Susan SwindellsCollege of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USTropical Diseases Research Centre · ZMUniversity of Liverpool · GBJohns Hopkins Medicine · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KETreatment Action Group · USUnited States Army Medical Research Directorate - Africa · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimalarial medications are recommended for chemoprevention as part of malaria control programs to decrease the morbidity and mortality related to more than 200 million infections each year. We sought to evaluate patient and provider acceptability of malaria chemoprevention in a long-acting formulation. We administered questionnaires to patients and providers in malaria endemic districts in Kenya and Zambia. Questions explored preferences and concerns around long-acting antimalarial formulations compared with oral formulations. We recruited 202 patient respondents (Kenya, n = 102; Zambia, n = 100) and 215 provider respondents (Kenya, n = 105; Zambia, n = 110). Long-acting injection was preferred to oral pills, whereas oral pills were preferred to implant or transdermal administration by patient respondents. Of 202 patient respondents, 80% indicated that they 'definitely would try' malaria chemoprevention offered by injection instead of oral pills. Of parents or guardians, 84% of 113 responded that they 'definitely would' have their child age < 12 years and 90% of 88 'definitely would' have their child ≥12 years receive an injection for malaria prevention. Provider respondents indicated that they would be more likely to prescribe a long-acting injectable product compared with an oral product for malaria chemoprevention in adults (70%), adolescents ages 12 years and older (67%), and children <12 years (81%). Potential for prolonged adverse effects with long-acting products was the highest concern for patient respondents, while higher medication-related cost was cited as the most concerning barrier to implementation by providers. Overall, these findings indicate enthusiasm for the development of long-acting injectable antimalarials to provide individual delivery method options across age groups.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaAdolescentAdultChemopreventionChildHumansInjectionsZambiaAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID37604474
PMCPMC10551098
OpenAlexW4386032773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.