Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37604194›Full record

SynthesisDie Rehabilitation2024

A Mega-Ethnography of Qualitative Meta-Syntheses on Return to Work in People with Chronic Health Conditions.

Betje Schwarz, Hannes Banaschak, Rebekka Heyme, Ernst von Kardorff, Nancy Reims, Marco Streibelt, Matthias Bethge

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Die Rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Betje SchwarzInstitute for Quality Assurance in Prevention and Rehabilitation (iqpr GmbH), German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hannes BanaschakInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Rebekka HeymeDepartment of Rehabilitation, German Federal Pension Insurance, Berlin, Germany.
Ernst von KardorffBerlin Factory for Social Research, Berlin, Germany.
Nancy ReimsInstitut for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-5849
Marco StreibeltDepartment for Rehabilitation Research, German Federal Pension Insurance, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias BethgeInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
German Insurance Association · DEInstitute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics · DEGerman Sport University Cologne · DEInstitut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung · DE

Funding

German Research Foundation 411744616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to synthesize the findings of qualitative meta-syntheses (QMS) on return to work (RTW) of people with different chronic illnesses and to develop a generic RTW model that can provide advice on how to improve RTW interventions and strategies.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Epistemonikos, CENTRAL, and PsycARTICLES to find relevant QMS, published in English or German between 2000 and 2021, and adapted the meta-ethnographic approach of Noblit and Hare to synthesize their findings.

resultsNineteen QMS (five focusing on musculoskeletal disorders or chronic pain, four on acquired or traumatic brain injuries, four on cancer, two on mental disorders, one on spinal cord injury, and three on mixed samples) met our inclusion criteria for the meta-ethnographic synthesis. Through systematic comparison and reciprocal translation of the single QMS findings, we could identify a set of key cross-cutting themes/concepts, which formed the basis for four RTW principles and a generic RTW model.

conclusionsRTW is a multifactorial and highly interactive multistakeholder process, embedded in an individual's life and working history, as well as in a determined social and societal context. It runs parallel and interdependently to the process of coping with the disease and realigning one's own identity, thus emphasizing the significance of RTW for the person. Besides symptoms and consequences of the disease, individual coping strategies, and RTW motivation, the course and success of RTW are strongly affected by the adaptability of the person's working environment and the social support in their private and working life. Thus, RTW is not only a problem of the individual, but also a matter of the social environment, especially the workplace, requiring a holistic, person-centered, and systemic approach, coordinated by a designated body, which considers the interests of all actors involved in the RTW process.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalReturn to WorkAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37604194
PMCPMC10857889
OpenAlexW4386023563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.