Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603604›Full record

ReviewCirculation2023

Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation.

Jason F Goldberg, Lauren K Truby, Sean Agbor-Enoh, Annette M Jackson, Christopher R deFilippi, Kiran K Khush, Palak Shah

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jason F GoldbergDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.).
Lauren K TrubyDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas (L.K.T.).
Sean Agbor-EnohDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (S.A.-E.).ORCID 0000-0002-9380-9161
Annette M JacksonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (A.M.J.).
Christopher R deFilippiDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-0660-4943
Kiran K KhushDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (K.K.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-9697-5926
Palak ShahDepartment of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, VA (J.F.G., C.R.d., P.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-8175-168X
Alaska Heart and Vascular Institute · USDuke University · USInova Children's Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

A Noninvasive Integrated Genomic Approach for Early Cancer Detection and Risk Stratification after TransplantationR01CA229766 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALIZADEH, ASH ARASH, KHUSH, KIRAN KAUR · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
MicroRNA Biomarkers of Allograft Rejection and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Cardiac TransplantationK23HL143179 · NHLBI · INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES · PI SHAH, PALAK · 2020 to 2024
$927k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229766NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300001CNHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States and worldwide continues to increase, but there has been little change in graft longevity and patient survival over the past 2 decades. The reference standard for diagnosis of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection includes histologic and immunofluorescence evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy samples, despite invasiveness and high interrater variability for grading histologic rejection. Circulating biomarkers and molecular diagnostics have shown substantial predictive value in rejection monitoring, and emerging data support their use in diagnosing other posttransplant complications. The use of genomic (cell-free DNA), transcriptomic (mRNA and microRNA profiling), and proteomic (protein expression quantitation) methodologies in diagnosis of these posttransplant outcomes has been evaluated with varying levels of evidence. In parallel, growing knowledge about the genetically mediated immune response leading to rejection (immunogenetics) has enhanced understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, associated graft dysfunction, and death. Antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigens and the technology available to evaluate these antibodies continues to evolve. This review aims to provide an overview of biomarker and immunologic tests used to diagnose posttransplant complications. This includes a discussion of pediatric heart transplantation and the disparate rates of rejection and death experienced by Black patients receiving a heart transplant. This review describes diagnostic modalities that are available and used after transplant and the landscape of future investigations needed to enhance patient outcomes after heart transplantation.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionHeart TransplantationAntibodiesBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsChildGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHLA AntigensHumansMicroRNAsPathology, MolecularRace FactorsAntibodiesBiomarkersCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHLA AntigensMicroRNAsbiomarkerscell-free nucleic acidsheart transplantationHLA antigensimmunogeneticsmicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID37603604
PMCPMC10449361
OpenAlexW4386022331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.