Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603558›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2023

Bacteriophages targeting protective commensals impair resistance against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in gnotobiotic mice.

Alexandra von Strempel, Anna S Weiss, Johannes Wittmann, Marta Salvado Silva, Diana Ring, Esther Wortmann, Thomas Clavel, Laurent Debarbieux, Karin Kleigrewe, Bärbel Stecher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The OMMGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bacteraemia due toClinical case reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. microLife · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra von StrempelMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0173-3022
Anna S WeissMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes WittmannLeibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Marta Salvado SilvaMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Diana RingMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Esther WortmannFunctional Microbiome Research Group, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas ClavelFunctional Microbiome Research Group, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Laurent DebarbieuxInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR6047, Bacteriophage Bacterium Host, Paris, France.
Karin KleigreweBavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Bärbel StecherMax von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7445-5193
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DERWTH Aachen University · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGerman Center for Infection Research · DELeibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbial communities protect the host against a variety of major human gastrointestinal pathogens. Bacteriophages (phages) are ubiquitous in nature and frequently ingested via food and drinking water. Moreover, they are an attractive tool for microbiome engineering due to the lack of known serious adverse effects on the host. However, the functional role of phages within the gastrointestinal microbiome remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the effects of microbiota-directed phages on infection with the human enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Tm), using a gnotobiotic mouse model (OMM14) for colonization resistance (CR). We show, that phage cocktails targeting Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis acted in a strain-specific manner. They transiently reduced the population density of their respective target before establishing coexistence for up to 9 days. Infection susceptibility to S. Tm was markedly increased at an early time point after challenge with both phage cocktails. Surprisingly, OMM14 mice were also susceptible 7 days after a single phage inoculation, when the targeted bacterial populations were back to pre-phage administration density. Concluding, our work shows that phages that dynamically modulate the density of protective members of the gut microbiota can provide opportunities for invasion of bacterial pathogens, in particular at early time points after phage application. This suggests, that phages targeting protective members of the microbiota may increase the risk for Salmonella infection.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaSalmonella InfectionsAnimalsEscherichia coliHumansMiceSalmonella typhimurium

Identifiers

PMID37603558
PMCPMC10470868
OpenAlexW4386022514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.