Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603542›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Implementation and prospective real-time evaluation of a generalized system for in-clinic deployment and validation of machine learning models in radiology.

James R Hawkins, Marram P Olson, Ahmed Harouni, Ming Melvin Qin, Christopher P Hess, Sharmila Majumdar, Jason C Crane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James R HawkinsCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-2483
Marram P OlsonCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Ahmed HarouniNVIDIA, Santa Clara, California, United States of America.
Ming Melvin QinNVIDIA, Santa Clara, California, United States of America.
Christopher P HessCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-5302
Sharmila MajumdarCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jason C CraneCenter for Intelligent Imaging, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medical imaging community has embraced Machine Learning (ML) as evidenced by the rapid increase in the number of ML models being developed, but validating and deploying these models in the clinic remains a challenge. The engineering involved in integrating and assessing the efficacy of ML models within the clinical workflow is complex. This paper presents a general-purpose, end-to-end, clinically integrated ML model deployment and validation system implemented at UCSF. Engineering and usability challenges and results from 3 use cases are presented. A generalized validation system based on free, open-source software (OSS) was implemented, connecting clinical imaging modalities, the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), and an ML inference server. ML pipelines were implemented in NVIDIA's Clara Deploy framework with results and clinician feedback stored in a customized XNAT instance, separate from the clinical record but linked from within PACS. Prospective clinical validation studies of 3 ML models were conducted, with data routed from multiple clinical imaging modalities and PACS. Completed validation studies provided expert clinical feedback on model performance and usability, plus system reliability and performance metrics. Clinical validation of ML models entails assessing model performance, impact on clinical infrastructure, robustness, and usability. Study results must be easily accessible to participating clinicians but remain outside the clinical record. Building a system that generalizes and scales across multiple ML models takes the concerted effort of software engineers, clinicians, data scientists, and system administrators, and benefits from the use of modular OSS. The present work provides a template for institutions looking to translate and clinically validate ML models in the clinic, together with required resources and expected challenges.

Identifiers

PMID37603542
PMCPMC10441783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.