Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603433›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of nutrition2023

Precision Nutrition: The Hype Is Exceeding the Science and Evidentiary Standards Needed to Inform Public Health Recommendations for Prevention of Chronic Disease.

Regan L Bailey, Patrick J Stover

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phytochemical Characterization of Freeze-DriedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Regan L BaileyInstitute for Advancing Health through Agriculture and Department of Nutrition Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; email: regan.bailey@ag.tamu.edu.
Patrick J StoverInstitute for Advancing Health through Agriculture and Department of Nutrition Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; email: regan.bailey@ag.tamu.edu.
Center for Advancing Health · US

Funding

Development of a Total Nutrient IndexU01CA215834 · NCI · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI REGAN BAILEY, JANET A. TOOZE · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As dietary guidance for populations shifts from preventing deficiency disorders to chronic disease risk reduction, the biology supporting such guidance becomes more complex due to the multifactorial risk profile of disease and inherent population heterogeneity in the diet-disease relationship. Diet is a primary driver of chronic disease risk, and population-based guidance should account for individual responses. Cascading effects on evidentiary standards for population-based guidance are not straightforward. Precision remains a consideration for dietary guidance to prevent deficiency through the identification of population subgroups with unique nutritional needs. Reducing chronic disease through diet requires greater precision in (

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusPublic HealthChronic DiseaseFeeding BehaviorHumansNutrientsNutrientsbiological variationdietary recommendationsnutrient requirementsnutrition policyprecision nutritionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37603433
PMCPMC11015823
OpenAlexW4386026124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.