Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603334›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Incidence, Stage, Treatment, and Survival of Noncardia Gastric Cancer.

Merel J M van Velzen, Michelle Braemer, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen, Johanna W van Sandick, Peter D Siersema, Jelle P Ruurda, Marcel Verheij, Manon C W Spaander, Laurens V Beerepoot, Nadia Haj Mohammad and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical impact of CT-defined sarcopenia on long-term oncological outcomes in gastric cancer: validation of muscle mass cut-offs established according to EWGSOP recommendations.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Expression and clinical significance ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebrovascular and Peripheral Vascular Complications in Cancer Patients.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Targeting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK Signaling Pathways in Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Merel J M van VelzenMedical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michelle BraemerCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Johanna W van SandickDepartment of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Laurens V BeerepootDepartment of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Nadia Haj MohammadDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenMedical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rob H A VerhoevenMedical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, and investigating its incidence, characteristics, treatment, and outcomes over the past decades can help in selecting clinical strategies and future research directions. Objective: To analyze the trends in incidence, staging, and treatment of gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included patients diagnosed with noncardia gastric cancer (NCGC) between 1989 and 2021 in the Netherlands. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival were analyzed per fixed time periods (1989-1993, 1994-1998, 1999-2003, 2004-2008, 2009-2013, 2014-2018, and 2019-2021). Results: In total, 47 014 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [64-80] years; 28 032 [60%] male patients) were identified with mostly adenocarcinomas of the antrum region (when location was known). Age-standardized incidence decreased from 20.3 to 6.1 per 100 000 person-years between 1989 and 2021. During the study period, unknown T and N stages were recorded less frequently, and metastatic disease was diagnosed more frequently (1989-1993: 2633 of 9493 patients [28%]; 2019-2021: 1503 of 3200 patients [47%] in 2019-2021). Over time, fewer patients with metastatic disease underwent surgery with or without other treatment modalities (68% in 1989-1993 vs 64% in 2019-2021), and palliative chemotherapy in metastatic NCGC increased from 9% to 40%. For patients with nonmetastatic disease, 5-year relative survival improved from 28% (95% CI, 26.5%-29.2%) to 36% (95% CI, 33.5%-37.6%) between 1989 and 2021. For patients with nonmetastatic disease undergoing a resection, 5-year survival increased from 40% (95% CI, 38.3%-41.8%) to 51% (95% CI, 47.9%-53.3%). For patients with metastatic disease, 1-year relative survival increased from 10% (95% CI, 8.7%-11.1%) to 19% (95% CI, 17.2%-21.6%), but 3-year relative survival remained poor at 5% (95% CI, 3.6%-7.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study involving 47 014 patients diagnosed with NCGC (1989-2021), the results showed a decrease in incidence, more accurate staging, a shift in treatment modalities, and improved patient survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryStomach NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMale

Identifiers

PMID37603334
PMCPMC10442714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.