ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
Extremely Preterm Infants with a Near-total Absence of Cerebellum: Usefulness of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance in Predicting the Motor Outcome.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebellar haemorrhage and atrophy in infants born extremely preterm with intraventricular haemorrhage.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate in extremely premature infants the severity of brain structural injury causing total absence or near-total absence of cerebellar hemispheres by using MRI visual and volumetric scoring systems. It also aims to assess the role of the score systems in predicting motor outcome. We developed qualitative and quantitative MRI scoring systems to grade the overall brain damage severity in 16 infants with total absence or near-total absence of cerebellar hemispheres. The qualitative scoring system assessed the severity of macrostructural abnormalities of cerebellum, brainstem, supratentorial gray and white matters, ventricles while the quantitative scoring system weighted the loss of brain tissue volumes, and gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) was used to assess motor function at 1- and 5-year follow-ups.Positive correlations between both MRI scores and GMFCS scales were detected at follow-ups (p > 0.05), but only the volumetric score could identify those infants developing higher levels of motor impairment.Brain volumetric MRI offers an unbiassed assessment of prenatal brain damage. The quantitative scoring system, performed at term equivalent age, can be a helpful tool for predicting the long-term motor outcome in extremely preterm infants with a near-total absence of cerebellum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.