Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603206›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2023

Early on-treatment C-reactive protein and its kinetics predict survival and response in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab.

Markus Haas, Alexander Lein, Thorsten Fuereder, Julia Schnoell, Faris F Brkic, David T Liu, Lorenz Kadletz-Wanke, Gregor Heiduschka, Bernhard J Jank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus HaasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Alexander LeinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Thorsten FuerederDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Julia SchnoellDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Faris F BrkicDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
David T LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Lorenz Kadletz-WankeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Gregor HeiduschkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria. gregor.heiduschka@meduniwien.ac.at.
Bernhard J JankDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFirst-line immune checkpoint blockade has improved the prognosis of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), but response rates remain low. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CRP and its early kinetics to predict response and survival in R/M HNSCC.

methodsA total of 87 patients who received first-line pembrolizumab for R/M HNSCC were analyzed. Three-fold cross-validation was used to estimate cut-off points of CRP at baseline and on-treatment (day 40 ± 10). Treatment response and survival were analyzed according to early CRP kinetics. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was used as a benchmark for the prognostic performance of CRP.

resultsOn-treatment CRP below 2 mg/dl, 4x the upper limit of normal (ULN), was associated with increased overall survival (OS), while on-treatment CRP below 3 mg/dl (6x ULN) was correlated with a higher disease control rate (DCR) and increased progression-free survival (PFS). CRP flare-responders and CRP responders showed a higher DCR and longer PFS than CRP non-responders. An NLR above 6 was a negative prognosticator for progression. In multivariable analysis, on-treatment CRP prevailed as the only significant prognosticator for OS (HR: 4.97, CI95%: 2.18-11.32, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.07, CI95%: 1.07-3.99, p = 0.030).

conclusionOn-treatment CRP was identified as a prognostic biomarker for objective response and survival in R/M HNSCC patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab and could be easily incorporated into clinical practice as a widely available and cost-effective biomarker.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalC-Reactive ProteinHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinpembrolizumabBiomarkersC-Reactive proteinHead and Neck NeoplasmsImmunotherapyKinetics

Identifiers

PMID37603206
PMCPMC10560194
OpenAlexW4386020163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.