Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603190›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2023

How do geriatricians evaluate decision-making ability for older adults with cognitive impairment? Results from an European survey.

Thomas Tannou, Fabrice Gzil, Seán P Kennelly, Jos Tournoy, Vincenza Frisardi, Pinar Soysal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas TannouCIUSS Centre-Sud de l'ile de Montréal, Centre de Recherche de l'institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4565 Rue Queen Mary, Montréal, QC, H3W1W5, Canada. thomas.tannou@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-9822
Fabrice GzilÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique, 35000, Rennes, France.
Seán P KennellyDepartment of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jos TournoyGerontology and Geriatrics Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Vincenza FrisardiNeuromotor Department, Geriatric Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia (RE), Louvain, Italy.
Pinar SoysalDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı (Vatan Street), Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe assessment of decision-making ability of older adults with cognitive impairment is a complex challenge that geriatricians often face in relation to risk-taking situations (driving, aging in place, financial decisions, etc.). However, there are no clear and consensual practice guidelines. An overview of current practices and needs seemed necessary.

methodsWe co-created and conducted an online survey to describe practice and knowledge, among European geriatricians. The survey was structured in 3 parts: a description of the professional's practice regarding cognitive impairment, a specific questionnaire about everyday risky decision-making evaluation and an investigation of the clinician's knowledge about relevant ethical and legal recommendations. Each part consisted of both multiple choice and open questions, analyzed through descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis methods.

resultsBased on the responses of 123 geriatricians across Europe, our survey showed that clinical interview is the cornerstone of geriatric assessment of decision-making ability of patients with mild to moderate dementia. When faced with risk-taking dilemma situations, geriatricians tend to favor a context of safety above autonomy, but they can support risky decision-making if it is consistent with the patient's previous lifestyle, depending on the degree of risk to self and others, on the decision-making ability assessed, and if there is some form of shared decision-making.

conclusionAssessing decision-making ability is challenging for geriatricians, who in our study relied more on their clinical interview and global cognitive tests than more in-depth evaluations. Supporting independent decision-making, when associated with risk-taking, requires better detection and anticipation shared with the patient environment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDecision MakingGeriatric AssessmentGeriatriciansAdultAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk-TakingSurveys and QuestionnairesAgingCognitive impairmentDecision-makingEthicsRisk-taking

Identifiers

PMID37603190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.