Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37603006›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in urology2023

Optimal combination therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: new evidence, challenges and unanswered questions.

Fabio Zattoni, Pawel Rajwa, Giorgio Gandaglia, Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party (YAU-PCa WP)

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cancer mortality predictions for 2025 in Latin America with focus on prostate cancer.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Pawel RajwaMedical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Giorgio GandagliaUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party (YAU-PCa WP)
Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATUniversity of Padua · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo evaluate the evidence supporting treatment intensification in mHSPC, with a focus on possible indications for treatment in each clinical setting. RECENT

findingsThere is a growing armamentarium of treatment options for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). These include combinations of treatments such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), docetaxel, and new antiandrogenic therapies. Treatment intensification with chemotherapy or newer hormonal agents may improve patient's oncologic outcomes, but it can also come with additional toxicities and costs. Therefore, we need to take into account individual patient factors and preferences when deciding on the optimal combination therapy. Additionally, ongoing research is needed to identify biomarkers and new image techniques that can predict response to treatment and identify the best candidate for each treatment. SUMMARY: Challenges and unanswered questions regarding treatment intensification and de-intensification are still present. Further studies are still needed to identify which patients would benefit most from this approach to improve quality of life without compromising overall survival outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID37603006
PMCPMC10552828
OpenAlexW4386019494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.