Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602823›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Use of a mixed-methods approach to develop a guidebook with messaging to encourage colorectal cancer screening among Black individuals 45 and older.

Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa, Michelle Aubertine, Aisha Parker, Kaitlin Sylvester, Caleb Levell, Emily Bell, Karen M Emmons, Folasade P May

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Adjoa Anyane-YeboaDivision of Gastroenterology, MGH, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-4105
Michelle AubertineKS&R, New York, New York, USA.
Aisha ParkerAlly Research Partners, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kaitlin SylvesterAmerican Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA.
Caleb LevellAmerican Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA.
Emily BellAmerican Cancer Society National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA.
Karen M EmmonsHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-6446
Folasade P MayVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-8171
American Cancer Society · USAMT (United States) · USKaiser Permanente · USMassachusetts Department of Public Health · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USPartners In Care · US

Funding

The Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control Equity - Research ProgramP50CA244433 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI EMMONS, KAREN M., TAVERAS BENAVIDEZ, ELSIE MIREYA · 2019 to 2023
$12.5M
Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244433NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and disproportionately impacts Black individuals. Here, we describe the mixed-methods approach used to develop a tailored message guidebook to promote CRC screening among Black individuals in the setting of recently updated screening guidelines.

methodsThis mixed-methods study included 10 in-depth qualitative interviews and 490 surveys in a nationally representative sample of unscreened Black individuals age ≥ 45. Messages were developed based on American Cancer Society (ACS) and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable (NCCRT) research findings, tested among Black individuals using MaxDiff analytic methods, and reviewed by a multi-sector expert advisory committee of NCCRT members.

resultsThe most frequently reported screening barrier in all age groups was self-reported procrastination (40.0% in age 45-49, 42.8% for age 50-54, 34.2% for age ≥ 55). Reasons for procrastination varied by age and included financial concerns, COVID-19 concerns, and fear of the test and bowel preparation. Additional screening barriers included lack of symptoms, provider recommendation, and family history of CRC. Most individuals age 45-49 preferred to receive screening information from a healthcare provider (57.5%); however, only 20% reported that a provider had initiated a screening conversation.

conclusionsWe identified age-specific barriers to CRC screening and tailored messaging to motivate participation among unscreened Black people age ≥ 45. Findings informed the development of the NCCRT and ACS guidebook for organizations and institutions aiming to increase CRC screening participation in Black individuals.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyCommunicationHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUnited Statesbarrierscolon cancercolonoscopycolorectal cancerscreeningstool-based testing

Identifiers

PMID37602823
PMCPMC10557828
OpenAlexW4386020057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.