ArticleCancer medicine2023
Monitoring of gastrointestinal carcinoma via molecular residual disease with circulating tumor DNA using a tumor-informed assay.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing for Early Diagnosis and Detection of Treatment Response, Minimal Residual Disease, and Recurrence in Gastroesophageal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Clonal evolution in gastrointestinal cancers: multi-omics insights into tumor heterogeneity, microenvironmental selection, and translational biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA detection in cancer: a comprehensive overview of current detection methods and prospects.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Role of circulating tumor DNA methylation in gastric cancer initiation and progression: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Research progress of CTC, ctDNA, and EVs in cancer liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Monitoring of gastrointestinal carcinoma via molecular residual disease with circulating tumor DNA using a tumor-informed assay.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, which can identify disease relapse ahead of radiological imaging, has shown promising performance. The objective of this study was to develop and validate OriMIRACLE S (Minimal Residual Circulating Nucleic Acid Longitudinal Detection in Solid Tumor), a highly sensitive and specific tumor-informed assay for MRD detection.
methodsTumor-specific somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified via whole exome sequencing of tumor tissue and matched germline DNA. Clonal SNVs were selected using the OriSelector algorithm for patient-specific, multiplex PCR-based NGS assays in MRD detection. Plasma-free DNA from patients with gastrointestinal tumors prior to and following an operation, and during monitoring, were ultradeep sequenced.
resultsThe detection of three positive sites was sufficient to achieve nearly 100% overall sample level sensitivity and specificity and was determined by calculating binomial probability based on customized panels containing 21 to 30 variants. A total of 127 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in our study. Preoperatively, MRD was positive in 18 of 26 patients (69.23%). Following surgery, MRD was positive in 24 of 82 patients (29.27%). The positivity rate for MRD was 33.33% (n = 18) for gastric adenocarcinoma and 32.26% (n = 62) for colorectal cancer. Twenty (20) of 59 patients (34.48%) experienced a change in MRD status over the monitoring period. Patients 8 and 31 responded to 3 cycles of systemic therapy, after which levels for all ctDNA dropped below the detection limit. Patient 53 was an example of using MRD to predict tumor metastasis. Patient 55 showed a weak response to treatments first and respond to new systemic therapy after tumor progression.
conclusionOur study identified a sensitive and specific clinical detection method for low frequency ctDNA, and explored the detection performance of this technology in gastrointestinal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.