Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602500›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2023

The conservation of gene models can support genome annotation.

Cassandria G Tay Fernandez, Philipp E Bayer, Jakob Petereit, Rajeev Varshney, Jacqueline Batley, David Edwards

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cassandria G Tay FernandezSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-3067
Jakob PetereitSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Rajeev VarshneyState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-5824
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-6760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genome annotations include false-positive gene models, leading to errors in phylogenetic and comparative studies. Here, we propose a method to support gene model prediction based on evolutionary conservation and use it to identify potentially erroneous annotations. Using this method, we developed a set of 15,345 representative gene models from 12 legume assemblies that can be used to support genome annotations for other legumes.

Indexed as

FabaceaePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37602500
PMCPMC12807225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.