Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602361›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2023

Combining the Real-Time Vial Sharing Strategy with Daily-Rate Charge Mode for Antimicrobial Drugs of Inpatients: An Economical and Practical Method for Patients and Hospitals.

Jianquan Li, Yongyang He, Xi Lei, Zhongqiang Cao, Yuwei Liao, Guoqiang Wang, Zebin Chen, Xuejuan Li, Xiaoya Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianquan LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongyang HeDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xi LeiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhongqiang CaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yuwei LiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Guoqiang WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Zebin ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuejuan LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoya LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-1457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial agents' wastage is a huge problem, especially for pediatric patients, resulting in excessive drug expenditure and increasing the economic burden on patients' families. Moreover, the cost of disposing of antimicrobial agents' waste and the risk of environmental and occupational exposure also increased. This study aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of the vial-sharing strategy combined with the daily-rate charge mode for pediatric inpatients to provide a strategy for reducing patients' expenditures, saving medical costs, and reducing drug proportion. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Service (PIVAS), Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Guangdong Province, China, in 2022. Data on prescription drugs were collected from the PIVAS system. Ten antimicrobial drugs with a frequency of prescriptions no less than twice once daily were selected, and the drug costs, drug weight, and drug saved were further analyzed according to the combination of real-time vial sharing strategy and daily-rate charge mode. Traditional single vial charge mode without vial sharing was set as a control strategy. The actual expenditure of the hospital was also calculated and analyzed. Results: During 2022, ¥ 4,122,099 (34.4%) was saved for inpatients by applying a vial-sharing strategy on ten antibacterial agents, and more than 46,343,750 mg (24.6%) of drugs were totally saved. The top 5 drugs saved by the real-time vial-sharing strategy were cefoperazone-sulbactam, vancomycin, amoxicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, and meropenem. Taken the price into consideration, the top five payment-saved drugs were vancomycin (¥ 1,522,385), meropenem (¥ 1,311,475), cefoperazone-sulbactam (¥ 736,697), imipenem-cilastatin (¥ 406,092), and amoxicillin-sulbactam (¥ 51,394). Moreover, the account balance of the hospital was up to ¥ 426,499. Conclusion: The real-time vial sharing strategy combined with the daily-rate charge mode greatly reduces drug wastage and patients' payments. It may be useful for hospitals with PIVAS to achieve vial-sharing while protecting the best interest of inpatients.

Indexed as

antimicrobial drugsdaily-charge modeinpatientsPIVASreal-time vial sharing strategy

Identifiers

PMID37602361
PMCPMC10438472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.