ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023
Evaluation of computed tomography images under deep learning in the diagnosis of severe pulmonary infection.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aimed to explore the diagnostic value of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) combined with computed tomography (CT) images in patients with severe pneumonia complicated with pulmonary infection. A total of 120 patients with severe pneumonia complicated by pulmonary infection admitted to the hospital were selected as research subjects and underwent CT imaging scans. The empty convolution (EC) and U-net phase were combined to construct an EC-U-net, which was applied to process the CT images. The results showed that the learning rate of the EC-U-net model decreased substantially with increasing training times until it stabilized and reached zero after 40 training times. The segmentation result of the EC-U-net model for the CT image was very similar to that of the mask image, except for some deviations in edge segmentation. The EC-U-net model exhibited a significantly smaller cross-entropy loss function (CELF) and a higher Dice coefficient than the CNN algorithm. The diagnostic accuracy of CT images based on the EC-U-net model for severe pneumonia complicated with pulmonary infection was substantially higher than that of CT images alone, while the false negative rate (FNR) and false positive rate (FPR) were substantially lower (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.