ArticleACS photonics2023
Environmental Effects on the Performance of Quantum Dot Luminescent Solar Concentrators.
Article in ACS photonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigations on Organic Push-Pull Dyes for Luminescent Solar Concentrator Applications.ACS applied optical materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) are all-photonic, semitransparent solar devices with great potential in the emerging fields of building-integrated photovoltaics and agrivoltaics. Over the past decade, particularly with the advent of quantum dot (QD) LSCs, tremendous progress has been made in terms of photovoltaic efficiency and device size by increasing solar spectral coverage and suppressing reabsorption losses. Despite these advances in LSC design, the effects of environmental conditions such as rain, dust, and dirt deposits, which are ubiquitous in both urban and agricultural environments, on LSC performance have been largely overlooked. Here, we address these issues by systematically investigating the environmental effects on the solar harvesting and waveguiding capability of state-of-the-art QD-LSCs, namely, the presence of airborne pollutants (dust), water droplets, and dried deposits. Our results show that dust is unexpectedly insignificant for the waveguiding of the concentrated luminescence and only reduces the LSC efficiency through a shadowing effect when deposited on the outer surface, while dust accumulation on the inner LSC side increases the output power due to backscattering of transmitted sunlight. Water droplets, on the other hand, do not dim the incident sunlight, but are detrimental to waveguiding by forming an optical interface with the LSC. Finally, dried deposits, which mimic the evaporation residues of heavy rain or humidity, have the worst effect of all, combining shading and waveguide losses. These results are relevant for the design of application-specific surface functionalization/protection strategies real LSC modules.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.