Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Machine learning in the prediction of post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

XiaoSheng Li, Zongning Chen, Hexian Jiao, BinYang Wang, Hui Yin, LuJia Chen, Hongling Shi, Yong Yin, Dongdong Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

XiaoSheng LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Zongning ChenDepartment of Research and Teaching, Lijiang People's Hospital, Lijiang, China.
Hexian JiaoDepartment of Research and Teaching, Lijiang People's Hospital, Lijiang, China.
BinYang WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Hui YinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
LuJia ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Hongling ShiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Yong YinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Dongdong QinDepartment of Research and Teaching, Lijiang People's Hospital, Lijiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive impairment is a detrimental complication of stroke that compromises the quality of life of the patients and poses a huge burden on society. Due to the lack of effective early prediction tools in clinical practice, many researchers have introduced machine learning (ML) into the prediction of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). However, the mathematical models for ML are diverse, and their accuracy remains highly contentious. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the efficiency of ML in the prediction of PSCI. Methods: Relevant articles were retrieved from Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from the inception of each database to 5 December 2022. Study quality was evaluated by PROBAST, and c-index, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the prediction models were meta-analyzed. Results: A total of 21 articles involving 7,822 stroke patients (2,876 with PSCI) were included. The main modeling variables comprised age, gender, education level, stroke history, stroke severity, lesion volume, lesion site, stroke subtype, white matter hyperintensity (WMH), and vascular risk factors. The prediction models used were prediction nomograms constructed based on logistic regression. The pooled c-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87), 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.80), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.86) in the training set, and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87), 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.90), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.68-0.82) in the validation set, respectively. Conclusion: ML is a potential tool for predicting PSCI and may be used to develop simple clinical scoring scales for subsequent clinical use. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=383476.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentmachine learningmeta-analysispredictionstroke

Identifiers

PMID37602236
PMCPMC10434510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.