Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602228›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Leveraging high-resolution omics data for predicting responses and adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Angelo Limeta, Francesco Gatto, Markus J Herrgård, Boyang Ji, Jens Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelo LimetaDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden.
Francesco GattoDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden.
Markus J HerrgårdBioInnovation Institute, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Boyang JiBioInnovation Institute, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Jens NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden.
BioInnovation Institute · DKChalmers University of Technology · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-standing goal of personalized and precision medicine is to enable accurate prediction of the outcomes of a given treatment regimen for patients harboring a disease. Currently, many clinical trials fail to meet their endpoints due to underlying factors in the patient population that contribute to either poor responses to the drug of interest or to treatment-related adverse events. Identifying these factors beforehand and correcting for them can lead to an increased success of clinical trials. Comprehensive and large-scale data gathering efforts in biomedicine by omics profiling of the healthy and diseased individuals has led to a treasure-trove of host, disease and environmental factors that contribute to the effectiveness of drugs aiming to treat disease. With increasing omics data, artificial intelligence allows an in-depth analysis of big data and offers a wide range of applications for real-world clinical use, including improved patient selection and identification of actionable targets for companion therapeutics for improved translatability across more patients. As a blueprint for complex drug-disease-host interactions, we here discuss the challenges of utilizing omics data for predicting responses and adverse events in cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The omics-based methodologies for improving patient outcomes as in the ICI case have also been applied across a wide-range of complex disease settings, exemplifying the use of omics for in-depth disease profiling and clinical use.

Indexed as

BiomarkersImmune-checkpoint inhibitorsImmune related adverse eventsOmicsPredictive models

Identifiers

PMID37602228
PMCPMC10432706
OpenAlexW4385191281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.