ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Leveraging high-resolution omics data for predicting responses and adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics and artificial intelligence for precision drug discovery and potential clinical applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Microbiome dysbiosis and its modulation in cancer development, prevention and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Cell-cell interactions as predictive and prognostic markers for drug responses in cancer.Genome medicine · 2025Review
- Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A long-standing goal of personalized and precision medicine is to enable accurate prediction of the outcomes of a given treatment regimen for patients harboring a disease. Currently, many clinical trials fail to meet their endpoints due to underlying factors in the patient population that contribute to either poor responses to the drug of interest or to treatment-related adverse events. Identifying these factors beforehand and correcting for them can lead to an increased success of clinical trials. Comprehensive and large-scale data gathering efforts in biomedicine by omics profiling of the healthy and diseased individuals has led to a treasure-trove of host, disease and environmental factors that contribute to the effectiveness of drugs aiming to treat disease. With increasing omics data, artificial intelligence allows an in-depth analysis of big data and offers a wide range of applications for real-world clinical use, including improved patient selection and identification of actionable targets for companion therapeutics for improved translatability across more patients. As a blueprint for complex drug-disease-host interactions, we here discuss the challenges of utilizing omics data for predicting responses and adverse events in cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The omics-based methodologies for improving patient outcomes as in the ICI case have also been applied across a wide-range of complex disease settings, exemplifying the use of omics for in-depth disease profiling and clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.