Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602194›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

The Importance of Using Realistic 3D Canopy Models to Calculate Light Interception in the Field.

Shunfu Xiao, Shuaipeng Fei, Qing Li, Bingyu Zhang, Haochong Chen, Demin Xu, Zhibo Cai, Kaiyi Bi, Yan Guo, Baoguo Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shunfu XiaoCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Shuaipeng FeiCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Qing LiCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Bingyu ZhangCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Haochong ChenCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Demin XuCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhibo CaiCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Kaiyi BiThe State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan GuoCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Baoguo LiCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhen ChenFarmland Irrigation Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Water-Saving Agriculture of Henan Province, Xinxiang, China.
Yuntao MaCollege of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6583-0342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying canopy light interception provides insight into the effects of plant spacing, canopy structure, and leaf orientation on radiation distribution. This is essential for increasing crop yield and improving product quality. Canopy light interception can be quantified using 3-dimensional (3D) plant models and optical simulations. However, virtual 3D canopy models (VCMs) have often been used to quantify canopy light interception because realistic 3D canopy models (RCMs) are difficult to obtain in the field. This study aims to compare the differences in light interception between VCMs and RCM. A realistic 3D maize canopy model (RCM) was reconstructed over a large area of the field using an advanced unmanned aerial vehicle cross-circling oblique (CCO) route and the structure from motion-multi-view stereo method. Three types of VCMs (VCM-1, VCM-4, and VCM-8) were then created by replicating 1, 4, and 8 individual realistic plants constructed by CCO in the center of the corresponding RCM. The daily light interception per unit area (DLI), as computed for the 3 VCMs, exhibited marked deviation from the RCM, as evinced by the relative root mean square error (rRMSE) values of 20.22%, 17.38%, and 15.48%, respectively. Although this difference decreased as the number of plants used to replicate the virtual canopy increased, rRMSE of DLI for VCM-8 and RCM still reached 15.48%. It was also found that the difference in light interception between RCMs and VCMs was substantially smaller in the early stage (48 days after sowing [DAS]) than in the late stage (70 DAS). This study highlights the importance of using RCM when calculating light interception in the field, especially in the later growth stages of plants.

Identifiers

PMID37602194
PMCPMC10437493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.