Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37602087›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Tissue Dielectric Constant Evaluation of Knee Edema: A Retrospective Intra-rater Reliability and Association Study of Repeated Measures.

James P Suchy, Ward M Glasoe, Linda A Koehler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James P SuchyDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Ward M GlasoeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Linda A KoehlerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis research compared the reliability and association of tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measures of knee edema to circumferential measurements of knee girth recorded as part of a physical therapy examination.

methodsTwenty adults having observable unilateral knee edema were enrolled. A single examiner measured edematous knee swelling with a TDC device and a tape measure across two visits. The presence of edema was recorded as a positive number in reporting side-to-side differences and a positive percentage in documenting change over time. Intra-rater reliability of the measures was assessed with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Percent change in edema was evaluated independently for both methods using a paired

resultsBoth measures were reliable (ICC ≥ 0.81), and both detected a significant percentage decrease (

conclusionThe two methods capture different physical attributes of edema. The TDC records the water content of the tissue, while the use of a tape measure records circumferential limb girth. The TDC measurement was reliable and more responsive in detecting a percentage decrease in knee edema in comparison to a circumferential measure of knee girth. The TDC method may have wider use in directly measuring edema in other tissue structures and regions of the body.

Indexed as

circumferential girth measurementevaluationknee edemaorthopedicstissue dielectric constant (tdc)

Identifiers

PMID37602087
PMCPMC10435093
OpenAlexW4384693101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.