Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601963›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2023

Comparison of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Triamcinolone Intraarticular Injection on Pain and Function in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Masume Bayat, Fateme Hojjati, Najmeh Sadat Boland Nazar, Mohsen Modabberi, Maryam Sadat Rahimi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06308887 (Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Perimeniscal Steroid and Dextrose Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06308887 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Perimeniscal Steroid and Dextrose Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorKastamonu UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsGonarthrosis, Meniscus, Degeneration, Pain, ChronicArmsTriamcinolone Acetonide, Dextrose 5% in water
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cartilage · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masume BayatPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fateme HojjatiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Najmeh Sadat Boland NazarPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen ModabberiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam Sadat RahimiCardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The present study was performed to assess the therapeutic effects of combined intra and extraarticular dextrose prolotherapy on knee osteoarthritis and its comparison with intra- articular triamcinolone injection. Methods: In this study, 50 patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis were allocated into two groups as a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The first group received one session of dextrose prolotherapy as one intra-articular injection of 10cc dextrose 16% and periarticular intradermal injections of dextrose 12% at 4 points around the knee (2.5 cc at each point). The second group underwent therapy with one intra-articular injection of triamcinolone (40 mg). Results: Compared to pretreatment, both interventions caused significant improvement in pain (evaluated by VAS) and WOMAC (all its components) in 1 and 3 months postintervention (all with P-value < 0.005). In the first month, pain reduction was significantly better in corticosteroid group (P-Value 0.002 and 0.048 respectively). In third month post intervention, improvements in VAS and WOMAC components were significantly greater in prolotherapy group. Conclusions: Both methods of corticosteroid and dextrose prolotherapy (combined intra and extraarticular technique) are effective on pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Compared to corticosteroid, prolotherapy method was associated with less pain reduction in short- term, but its effects were more persistent and in midterm examinations (3 months), it was more effective than corticosteroid.

Indexed as

DextroseInjectionLidocaineNeurofascialOsteoarthritisPain, KneeProlotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37601963
PMCPMC10439689
OpenAlexW4362720874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.