Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601933›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Effect of spine frame on the changes in respiratory dynamics in prone patients under general anaesthesia- a prospective, observational study.

Preeti Kandasamy, Vinayak S Pujari, Sandya Rani D Channaiah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Preeti KandasamyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vinayak S PujariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Manipal Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sandya Rani D ChannaiahDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M.S. Ramaiah Medical College · INManipal Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The prone position is one of the common surgical positions used in clinical practice. Manoeuvring patients from supine to a prone position can impact respiratory dynamics and result in haemodynamic variations. Methods: This study included 64 patients and was conducted after obtaining approval from the ethics committee and registration of the trial. The primary objective was to evaluate the changes in peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (P Results: On turning the patient prone, there was statistically significant increase in median PIP (Group S 4 cmH Conclusions: Our study found that prone positioning with a spine frame led to a significantly greater increase in airway pressures and a decrease in dynamic compliance when compared to patients positioned prone without the spine frame.

Indexed as

Lung compliancenephrolithotomypatient positioningprone positionrespiratory dynamicsspine framespine surgery

Identifiers

PMID37601933
PMCPMC10436715
OpenAlexW4384432065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.