Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601890›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2023

Deep learning based suture training system.

Mohammed Mansour, Eda Nur Cumak, Mustafa Kutlu, Shekhar Mahmud

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammed MansourDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey.
Eda Nur CumakDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey.
Mustafa KutluDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey.
Shekhar MahmudDepartment of Systems Engineering, Military Technological College, Muscat, Oman.
Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler ÜniversitesiMuscat College · OMSakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Surgical suturing is a fundamental skill that all medical and dental students learn during their education. Currently, the grading of students' suture skills in the medical faculty during general surgery training is relative, and students do not have the opportunity to learn specific techniques. Recent technological advances, however, have made it possible to classify and measure suture skills using artificial intelligence methods, such as Deep Learning (DL). This work aims to evaluate the success of surgical suture using DL techniques. Methods: Six Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models: VGG16, VGG19, Xception, Inception, MobileNet, and DensNet. We used a dataset of suture images containing two classes: successful and unsuccessful, and applied statistical metrics to compare the precision, recall, and F1 scores of the models. Results: The results showed that Xception had the highest accuracy at 95 %, followed by MobileNet at 91 %, DensNet at 90 %, Inception at 84 %, VGG16 at 73 %, and VGG19 at 61 %. We also developed a graphical user interface that allows users to evaluate suture images by uploading them or using the camera. The images are then interpreted by the DL models, and the results are displayed on the screen. Conclusions: The initial findings suggest that the use of DL techniques can minimize errors due to inexperience and allow physicians to use their time more efficiently by digitizing the process.

Indexed as

ClassificationDeep learningSuture training

Identifiers

PMID37601890
PMCPMC10432819
OpenAlexW4385614076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.