ArticleSurgery open science2023
Deep learning based suture training system.
Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automatic Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Learning.Beyoglu eye journal · 2026Article
- Face2Bone explainable AI model predicts osteoporosis risk from facial images in proof of concept study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Review
- Evaluation of Transfer Learning Efficacy for Surgical Suture Quality Classification on Limited Datasets.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning for gender estimation using hand radiographs: a comparative evaluation of CNN models.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Surgical suturing is a fundamental skill that all medical and dental students learn during their education. Currently, the grading of students' suture skills in the medical faculty during general surgery training is relative, and students do not have the opportunity to learn specific techniques. Recent technological advances, however, have made it possible to classify and measure suture skills using artificial intelligence methods, such as Deep Learning (DL). This work aims to evaluate the success of surgical suture using DL techniques. Methods: Six Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models: VGG16, VGG19, Xception, Inception, MobileNet, and DensNet. We used a dataset of suture images containing two classes: successful and unsuccessful, and applied statistical metrics to compare the precision, recall, and F1 scores of the models. Results: The results showed that Xception had the highest accuracy at 95 %, followed by MobileNet at 91 %, DensNet at 90 %, Inception at 84 %, VGG16 at 73 %, and VGG19 at 61 %. We also developed a graphical user interface that allows users to evaluate suture images by uploading them or using the camera. The images are then interpreted by the DL models, and the results are displayed on the screen. Conclusions: The initial findings suggest that the use of DL techniques can minimize errors due to inexperience and allow physicians to use their time more efficiently by digitizing the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.