Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601867›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2023

A comparison of peripheral blood stem cell collection outcomes for multiple myeloma; mobilization matters in the era of IMiD induction.

Thea Chandler, Christopher Parrish, Marina Karakantza, Jonathan Carmichael, David Pawson, Gordon Cook, Frances Seymour

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thea ChandlerSt James's Institute of Oncology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1899-7510
Christopher ParrishSt James's Institute of Oncology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.
Marina KarakantzaNHS Blood and Transplant Barnsley UK.
Jonathan CarmichaelSt James's Institute of Oncology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-0384
David PawsonNHS Blood and Transplant Barnsley UK.
Gordon CookSt James's Institute of Oncology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.
Frances SeymourSt James's Institute of Oncology Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-7195
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) requires mobilization from the bone marrow. There is variation in mobilization choice; during the COVID-19 pandemic BSBMT&CT guidelines recommended using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone to minimize the use of chemotherapy. We report on the impact of mobilization regimen on stem cell collection, and whether IMiD-containing induction therapy impacts on mobilization and consequently transplant engraftment times for 83 patients undergoing ASCT at Leeds Teaching Hospitals. Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (cyclo-G) mobilization yielded more CD34

Indexed as

myelomastem cell mobilization/homingstem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID37601867
PMCPMC10435720
OpenAlexW4382314345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.