ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Comparing Diagnostic Efficacy of C-TIRADS Positive Features on Different Sizes of Thyroid Nodules.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing C-TIRADS for sub-centimeter thyroid nodules using machine learning-derived feature importance.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Alteration Trend and Overlap Analysis of Positive Features in Different-Sized Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: Based on Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the diagnostic value of positive features in the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) for thyroid nodules of different sizes. Patients and Methods: A total of 1864 patients with 2347 thyroid nodules were selected from January 2021 to December 2022 and assessed according to C-TIRADS. According to the maximum diameter, nodules were divided into the A1 group (≤10 mm), A2 group (>10 mm,<20 mm), and A3 group (≥20 mm). With surgical pathology as the golden standard, the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and each group's area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The diagnostic value of positive features in C-TIRADS for different sizes of thyroid nodules was analyzed. Results: In all groups, malignant thyroid nodules had a higher incidence of positive features than benign nodules (P < 0.05). In A1 group, the diagnostic efficiency of C-TIRADS positive features for thyroid nodules was vertical orientation> ill-defined/irregular margin or extrathyroidal extension> solid composition> markedly hypoechoic> microcalcifications. The AUCs were 0.718, 0.675, 0.609, 0.558, and 0.581, respectively. In A2 group, the diagnostic efficacy of each positive features for thyroid nodules was ill-defined/irregular margins or extra-thyroid invasion> solid composition> microcalcifications> markedly hypoechoic> vertical orientation. The AUCs were 0.854, 0.730, 0.719, 0.670, and 0.609, respectively. In A3 group, the diagnostic efficacy of each positive features for thyroid nodules was ill-defined/irregular margin or extrathyroidal extension> microcalcifications> solid composition> vertical orientation> markedly hypoechoic. The AUCs were 0.847, 0.778, 0.767, 0.584, and 0.560, respectively. Conclusion: C-TIRADS positive features exhibited different diagnostic efficacy for thyroid nodules of various sizes, especially for thyroid nodules ≤10 mm, for which all positive features had low diagnostic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.