Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Sophie Aurich, Juliane Schneider, Hanka Brangsch, Ad Koets, Falk Melzer, Christa Ewers, Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Isolation of Brucella suis from cattle in India: whole genome analysis unravels potential for zoonotic transmission.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  5. Genomic epidemiology ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. The European Union One Health 2023 Zoonoses report.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie Aurich *Department of Veterinary Science, Institute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Juliane Schneider *Tierärztliche Klinik für Kleintiere am Kaiserberg, Duisburg, Germany.
Hanka BrangschInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Ad KoetsDepartment of Bacteriology, Host-Pathogen Interaction and Diagnostics, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, Netherlands.
Falk MelzerInstitute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Jena, Germany.
Christa EwersDepartment of Veterinary Science, Institute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Ellen Prenger-BerninghoffDepartment of Veterinary Science, Institute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, a case of canine brucellosis diagnosed in a dog with orchitis was presented to a veterinary practice in Germany. Serological testing excluded

Indexed as

Brucella suis biovar 1canine brucellosisepididymitisgenotypingraw meat dietreproductive diseasewhole genome sequencingzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID37601758
PMCPMC10435866
OpenAlexW4385516155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.