ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023
Impact of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing in the Management of Patients With Suspected Infectious Diseases.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent Burkholderia cepacia detected by plasma mcfDNA sequencing in a child with MRSA liver abscess and chronic granulomatous disease: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Cell-free DNA metagenomic next generation sequencing for the diagnosis of infectious diseases: a retrospective assessment of clinical utility in a tertiary and quaternary care facility.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Refining the Clinical Utility of Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in High-Risk Population of Infection: A Narrative Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Yield of clinical metagenomics: insights from real-world practice for tissue infections.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- The Brief Case:Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- The Value of Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis and Therapy of Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cell-free DNA is an emerging modality for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, but studies on its clinical utility are limited. We conducted a retrospective single-center study including all patients who had plasma mNGS sent at the University of Michigan between 1 January 2021 and 25 July 2022. Test results were assessed for clinical impact. A total of 71 tests were sent on 69 patients; the mean ± SD age was 52 ± 19 years; and 35% of patients were immunocompromised. Forty-five (63%) mNGS test results were positive and 14 (31%) had clinical impact-from starting new antimicrobials (n = 7), discontinuing antimicrobials (n = 4), or changing antimicrobial duration (n = 2) or by affecting surgical decision making (n = 1). Twenty-six (37%) mNGS test results were negative and only 4 (15%) were impactful, leading to discontinuation of antimicrobials. Overall, just 25% of mNGS tests were clinically relevant. There was no significant difference in the proportion of tests that were clinically relevant between negative and positive results (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.