ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023
Pharmacovigilance Study on Eosinophilic Pneumonia Induced by Anti-MRSA Agents: Analysis Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Daptomycin eosinophilic pneumonia, a systematic review of the literature and case series.Infection · 2024Pooled it
- Eosinophilia-related adverse events reporting associated with medications: a disproportionality and regression analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the Safety Profiles Associated with Anti-MRSA Agents Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship: evolving roles in clinical practice.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Review
- Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia: a real-world data mining study of the FAERS and Vigibase database reveals potential safety signals and risk patterns.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare adverse event caused by several types of drugs, such as antibiotics; however, its characteristics remain poorly described. This study aimed to analyze the disproportionality between the occurrence of EP and anti-methicillin-resistant Method: Disproportionality linking EP and anti-MRSA agents was analyzed through bayesian confidence propagation neural networks of information components and reporting odds ratio methodologies. The FAERS data set for the fourth quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2022 was used. We also analyzed the characteristics of EP induced by anti-MRSA agents. Results: A total of 14 805 795 reports were obtained from FAERS. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the EP signal was detected only in cases with the administration of daptomycin (DAP). This disproportionality signal was consistently detected in the sensitivity analysis. When compared with other reports of DAP-related adverse events, the reports of DAP-related EP were characterized by male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.37), older age (>70 years; OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.68-4.33), and longer duration of treatment (>21 days; OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.21-8.05). Conclusions: This study revealed that among the anti-MRSA agents, disproportionality in the occurrence of EP was observed only with DAP. Our results suggest that sex, age, and treatment duration may affect the occurrence of DAP-induced EP. Clinicians should exercise caution regarding EP during DAP administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.