Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601676›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Identifying clinicopathological risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis in Chinese patients with T1 breast cancer: a population-based study.

Gang Liu, Zeyu Xing, Changyuan Guo, Qichen Dai, Han Cheng, Xiang Wang, Yu Tang, Yipeng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gang LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zeyu XingDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Changyuan GuoDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qichen DaiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Han ChengDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu TangGCP center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yipeng WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze clinicopathological risk factors and regular pattern of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Chinese patients with T1 breast cancer and the effect on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Materials and methods: Between 1999 and 2020, breast cancer patients meeting inclusion criteria of unilateral, no distant metastatic site, and T1 invasive ductal carcinoma were reviewed. Clinical pathology characteristics were retrieved from medical records. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Results: We enrolled 11,407 eligible patients as a discovery cohort to explore risk factors for LNM and 3484 patients with stage T1N0 as a survival analysis cohort to identify the effect of those risk factors on OS and DFS. Compared with patients with N- status, patients with N+ status had a younger age, larger tumor size, higher Ki67 level, higher grade, higher HR+ and HER2+ percentages, and higher luminal B and HER2-positive subtype percentages. Logistic regression indicated that age was a protective factor and tumor size/higher grade/HR+ and HER2+ risk factors for LNM. Compared with limited LNM (N1) patients, extensive LNM (N2/3) patients had larger tumor sizes, higher Ki67 levels, higher grades, higher HR- and HER2+ percentages, and lower luminal A subtype percentages. Logistic regression indicated that HR+ was a protective factor and tumor size/higher grade/HER2+ risk factors for extensive LNM. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that grade was a predictor of both OS and DFS; HR was a predictor of OS but not DFS. Multivariate survival analysis using the Cox regression model demonstrated age and Ki67 level to be predictors of OS and grade and HER2 status of DFS in stage T1N0 patients. Conclusion: In T1 breast cancer patients, there were several differences between N- and N+ patients, limited LNM and extensive LNM patients. Besides, HR+ plays a dual role in regional LNM. In patients without LNM, age and Ki67 level are predictors of OS, and grade and HER2 are predictors of DFS.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinical pathologyhormone receptorlymph node metastasissmall-sized tumor with extensive metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37601676
PMCPMC10436470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.