Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601611›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022

Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification on Laparoscopic Resections for Rectal Cancer in Japan: The EnSSURE Study.

Nobuki Ichikawa, Shigenori Homma, Koya Hida, Tomonori Akagi, Yasuyuki Kamada, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Masaaki Ito, Fumio Ishida, Jun Watanabe, Daisuke Yamamoto and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Nobuki IchikawaFrom the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shigenori HommaFrom the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Koya HidaDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomonori AkagiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Yasuyuki KamadaDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomohiro YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Fumio IshidaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Jun WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Daisuke YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hiroaki IijimaFrom the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shigeki YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi InomataDepartment of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Yoshiharu SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Japan Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Akinobu TaketomiFrom the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This cohort study investigated short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for rectal cancer performed with versus without certified surgeons. Background: In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) evaluates surgical skills deemed essential for laparoscopic surgery; however, it is unknown whether this certification contributes to procedural safety. Methods: Outcomes of laparoscopic rectal resections for cStage II and III rectal cancer performed from 2014 to 2016 at 56 Japanese hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The impact of having versus not having certified surgeons on postoperative complications and other short- and long-term outcomes were assessed. In cases with ESSQS-certified surgeons, surgeons attended surgery in the capacity of an operator, assistant, scope operator, or advisor. Results: Overall, 3188 procedures were analyzed, with 2644 procedures performed with and 544 without ESSQS-certified surgeons. A multivariate logistic regression model showed that the adjusted odds ratio of postoperative complications after procedures performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.91; Conclusions: This study showed the superiority of the short-term postoperative results for laparoscopic rectal procedures performed with ESSQS-certified surgeons.

Indexed as

laparoscopicrectal cancersafetytechnical qualification

Identifiers

PMID37601611
PMCPMC10431478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.