Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601506›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Comparative study between surgical wound catheter, femoral nerve block, and adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroplasty: A double blind randomized clinical trial.

Salah N El Tallawy, Wegdan A Ali, Ahmed K Thallaj, Rania S Ahmed, Essam M Manaa, Mohamed S Mostafa, Fawzi F Aljasser, Haneen F Amlih, Abeer A Hassanin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07732465 (Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block in Postoperative Co-analgesia for Cardiac Surgery With Saphenous Vein Harvesting), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07732465 phase2 / phase3not yet recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block in Postoperative Co-analgesia for Cardiac Surgery With Saphenous Vein Harvesting

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontreal Heart InstituteRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery, SaphenectomyArmsAductor canal bloc, Control adductor canal block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Salah N El TallawyDepartment of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wegdan A AliDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Egypt.
Ahmed K ThallajDepartment of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rania S AhmedCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Essam M ManaaDepartment of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed S MostafaDepartment of Anesthesia, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fawzi F AljasserDepartment of Orthopedic, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haneen F AmlihDepartment of Anesthesia, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer A HassaninDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Egypt.
King Khalid University Hospital · SAMinia University · EGAlfaisal University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The present study compared the surgical wound catheter (SWC), femoral nerve block (FNB), and adductor canal block (ACB) for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroplasty. Methods: The study included (180) patients scheduled for unilateral total knee replacement and were randomly allocated into three groups. Patients received postoperative analgesia via continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (10 ml bolus followed by continuous infusion of 5 ml/hour) through the SWC, FNB, or ACB groups. All groups received supplemental analgesia by IV morphine using patient controlled analgesia. Pain scores were assessed at rest and during movements, the worst and least pain scores, and how often were in worst pain during the first 72 hours. The functional activity and patient's satisfaction were also recorded. Results: The study showed significant reductions in pain scores at rest and during movements in all groups compared to the baseline scores. Significant reductions in pain scores were observed in both ACB and FNB groups compared to the SWC group ( Conclusions: In terms of efficiency, ACB provided the highest quality of analgesia in terms of pain relief, functional activity, and patient's satisfaction. Both ACB and FNB provided higher quality of analgesia compared to the SWC. While ACB and SWC provided better functional improvements compared to FNB.

Indexed as

Adductor canal blockfemoral nerve blockpostoperative painregional analgesiasurgical wound cathetertotal knee replacements

Identifiers

PMID37601506
PMCPMC10435797
OpenAlexW4386019586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.