ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2023
Effect of HMGB1 and HBD-3 levels in the diagnosis of sepsis- A comparative descriptive study.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction: a comprehensive review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Anti-DAMP therapies for acute inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Navigating the Modern Landscape of Sepsis: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by a dysregulated host response to infection. Early and accurate diagnosis of sepsis is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. In recent years, there has been growing interest in identifying reliable biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of sepsis. This study aims to evaluate the levels of two potential biomarkers, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and human β-defensin 3 (HBD-3), and compare their diagnostic efficacy in sepsis. We aimed to assess HMGB-1 and HBD-3 levels in sepsis and assess the combined diagnostic validity of HMGB-1 and HBD-3. In this case-control study, the plasma concentration of HMGB-1 and HBD-3 was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Two groups, totaling 144 people, were formed; 66 patients treated in the ICU for sepsis were included in the patient group. 78 Blood donors from the Salmaniya Medical Complex Blood Bank who had no prior infection or inflammatory disease made up the Control group. The statistical computations were performed using the STATA 8® statistical software tool (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). In patients' mean HMGB-1 levels were 2.1442 ng/ml, compared to 0.62141 ng/ml in the control group. The mean HBD-3 level was 1068.453 ng/ml in sepsis patients versus 589.935 ng/ml in controls. A significant difference between the two groups has been observed in both biomarkers (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of HMGB-1 was 75.8% and 41.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HBD-3 were 63.6% and 93.5%, respectively. The levels of HMGB-1 and HBD-3 between healthy and septic subjects varied significantly. HMGB-1 and HBD-3 levels in the blood tested together might accurately identify sepsis. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the utility of biomarkers in sepsis diagnosis, and may ultimately aid in the development of more effective diagnostic strategies for sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.