ArticleVaccine: X2023
Comparative estimates of crude coverage of the Mexican immunization program: Findings from a national survey.
Article in Vaccine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimated pneumococcal disease burden in children due to serotypes covered by different pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in five Latin American countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- An Update on Viral Hepatitis B and C in Mexico: Advances and Pitfalls in Eradication Strategies.Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to provide estimates for immunization coverage, considering single-dose and schemes (three or five vaccines), by comparing self-report method to immunization cards, while also assessing the timeliness of immunization in Mexico, with reference to Mexican Immunization Program guidelines. Data on immunization was obtained from the Mexican Immunization Survey conducted in 2017 that aimed to assess crude (card-based) coverage at the regional level. Timely immunization was defined with reference to National Immunization Program guidelines, and immunization coverage was defined as a three or five vaccine scheme, based on previous national reports of immunization coverage. Immunization coverage estimates account for sample weights from the complex survey design. We used weighted immunization coverage estimates to assess the extent to which immunization cards and self-reporting concurred. It was found that most Mexican children are not receiving their full vaccine schedule in a timely manner. Concerning children under twelve months of age, the coverage targets for National Immunization of 95 % was not reached for either vaccine, and only 2.94 % (95 % CI 0.92-9.01) who had been receiving a three-vaccine scheme were considered as fully immunized in a timely manner. In contrast, coverage increased to 33.94 % (95 % CI 26.99-41.66), when untimely immunizations were taken into account, and the 95 % target was reached for five vaccines. Likewise, there is little correlation between self-report and immunization cards but rates show more concurrence, when only considering the proportion of true positives. In conclusion it was find that children at a local level are vaccinated in an incomplete and untimely manner. In order to improve immunization systems, a nominal registry of administered doses is thus of paramount importance. There is a need to address underlying health inequalities, as well as the factors associated with these, resulting in improved chances of a disease-free childhood and healthy life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.