ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative utilization of genomic resources for improved phylogenetic resolution in Sonerileae (Melastomataceae).American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Genotyping: Innovations Driving Plant Genomic Improvement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patterns of Interploidy Admixture in Polyploid Complexes: Insights From Thymus Sect. Mastichina (Lamiaceae).Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Low genetic differentiation among morphologically distinct Cycas species informs the delineation of conservation management units.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Urticaceae542 as a novel probe set combining universal and lineage-specific loci for phylogenomics of Urticaceae.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Subfamily evolution analysis using nuclear and chloroplast data from the same reads.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive SSR study of 14 Zingiberaceae species based on microsatellite capture sequencing (MiCAPs).Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- Optimizing DNA extraction protocols for bryophytes: Insights from Orthotrichaceae.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- Astragalean819: An Astragalean clade-specific bait set to resolve phylogenetic relationships inApplications in plant sciencesArticle
- hybpiper-nf and paragone-nf: Containerization and additional options for target capture assembly and paralog resolution.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent technological advances in long-read high-throughput sequencing and assembly methods have facilitated the generation of annotated chromosome-scale whole-genome sequence data for evolutionary studies; however, generating such data can still be difficult for many plant species. For example, obtaining high-molecular-weight DNA is typically impossible for samples in historical herbarium collections, which often have degraded DNA. The need to fast-freeze newly collected living samples to conserve high-quality DNA can be complicated when plants are only found in remote areas. Therefore, short-read reduced-genome representations, such as target capture and genome skimming, remain important for evolutionary studies. Here, we review the pros and cons of each technique for non-model plant taxa. We provide guidance related to logistics, budget, the genomic resources previously available for the target clade, and the nature of the study. Furthermore, we assess the available bioinformatic analyses, detailing best practices and pitfalls, and suggest pathways to combine newly generated data with legacy data. Finally, we explore the possible downstream analyses allowed by the type of data generated using each technique. We provide a practical guide to help researchers make the best-informed choice regarding reduced genome representation for evolutionary studies of non-model plants in cases where whole-genome sequencing remains impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.