Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601308›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

YouTube's recommendation algorithm is left-leaning in the United States.

Hazem Ibrahim, Nouar AlDahoul, Sangjin Lee, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazem IbrahimDepartment of Computer Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-214X
Nouar AlDahoulDepartment of Computer Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-0033
Sangjin LeeDepartment of Computer Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2206-2009
Talal RahwanDepartment of Computer Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0070-0667
Yasir ZakiDepartment of Computer Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-6944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over two billion monthly active users, YouTube currently shapes the landscape of online political video consumption, with 25% of adults in the United States regularly consuming political content via the platform. Considering that nearly three-quarters of the videos watched on YouTube are delivered via its recommendation algorithm, the propensity of this algorithm to create echo chambers and deliver extremist content has been an active area of research. However, it is unclear whether the algorithm may exhibit political leanings toward either the Left or Right. To fill this gap, we constructed archetypal users across six personas in the US political context, ranging from Far Left to Far Right. Utilizing these users, we performed a controlled experiment in which they consumed over eight months worth of videos and were recommended over 120,000 unique videos. We find that while the algorithm pulls users away from political extremes, this pull is asymmetric, with users being pulled away from Far Right content stronger than from Far Left. Furthermore, we show that the recommendations made by the algorithm skew left even when the user does not have a watch history. Our results raise questions on whether the recommendation algorithms of social media platforms in general, and YouTube, in particular, should exhibit political biases, and the wide-reaching societal and political implications that such biases could entail.

Indexed as

algorithmic biaspolitical radicalizationrecommendation systems

Identifiers

PMID37601308
PMCPMC10433241
OpenAlexW4385802839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.