Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601254›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms in virus genomes assembled from high-throughput sequencing data: large-scale performance testing of sequence analysis strategies.

Johan Rollin, Rachelle Bester, Yves Brostaux, Kadriye Caglayan, Kris De Jonghe, Ales Eichmeier, Yoika Foucart, Annelies Haegeman, Igor Koloniuk, Petr Kominek and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

Johan RollinLaboratory of Plant Pathology-TERRA-Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
Rachelle BesterCitrus Research International, Matieland, South Africa.
Yves BrostauxLaboratory of Statistics, Computer Science and Modelling Applied to Bioengineering, TERRA, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Teaching and Research Centre, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
Kadriye CaglayanPlant Protection Department, Agricultural Faculty, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
Kris De JongheFisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ales EichmeierMendeleum-Institute of Genetics, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Lednice, Czech Republic.
Yoika FoucartFisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Annelies HaegemanFisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Igor KoloniukBiology Centre CAS, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Petr KominekCrop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republic.
Hans MareeCitrus Research International, Matieland, South Africa.
Serkan OnderDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Susana Posada CéspedesDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, 4058, Switzerland.
Vahid RoumiPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.
Dana ŠafářováDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-0530
Olivier SchumppPlant Protection Department, Agroscope, Nyon, Switzerland.
Cigdem Ulubas SercePlant Production and Technologies Department, Ayhan Şahenk Faculty of Agricultural Science and Technologies, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey.
Merike SõmeraDepartment of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Lucie TamisierPathologie Végétale, Institut National de la Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Montfavet, France.
Eeva VainioNatural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Rene Aa van der VlugtWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sebastien MassartLaboratory of Plant Pathology-TERRA-Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEStellenbosch University · ZAAgroscope · CHCzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZCzech Agrifood Research Center · CZEskişehir Osmangazi University · TRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRMendel University in Brno · CZMustafa Kemal University · TRNatural Resources Institute Finland · FINiğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi · TRPalacký University Olomouc · CZSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHTallinn University of Technology · EEUniversity of Maragheh · IRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies and bioinformatics have drastically changed research in virology, especially for virus discovery. Indeed, proper monitoring of the viral population requires information on the different isolates circulating in the studied area. For this purpose, HTS has greatly facilitated the sequencing of new genomes of detected viruses and their comparison. However, bioinformatics analyses allowing reconstruction of genome sequences and detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can potentially create bias and has not been widely addressed so far. Therefore, more knowledge is required on the limitations of predicting SNPs based on HTS-generated sequence samples. To address this issue, we compared the ability of 14 plant virology laboratories, each employing a different bioinformatics pipeline, to detect 21 variants of pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) in three samples through large-scale performance testing (PT) using three artificially designed datasets. To evaluate the impact of bioinformatics analyses, they were divided into three key steps: reads pre-processing, virus-isolate identification, and variant calling. Each step was evaluated independently through an original, PT design including discussion and validation between participants at each step. Overall, this work underlines key parameters influencing SNPs detection and proposes recommendations for reliable variant calling for plant viruses. The identification of the closest reference, mapping parameters and manual validation of the detection were recognized as the most impactful analysis steps for the success of the SNPs detections. Strategies to improve the prediction of SNPs are also discussed.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputational BiologyGenome, ViralHumansKnowledgeBioinformaticGenomicPlantVariantVirus

Identifiers

PMID37601254
PMCPMC10439718
OpenAlexW4385875998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.