ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
How to bridge the nurse innovation-diffusion gap? An in-depth case study of Create4Care.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Entrepreneurial and innovative skills in healthcare: Development and preliminary validation of an assessment instrument for Portuguese nurses.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Patient and Designer Collaboration in Cocreating Technical Innovations in a Hospital-Based Makerspace: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of innovative behavior among hemodialysis nurses and their association with artificial intelligence literacy: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of '4P' Theory-Based Training on Innovative Capability in Clinical Nurses: A Pre-Post Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Nurses Innovative Behaviour in the Context of Authentic Leadership: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Analysis of the current status and future vision of innovation in a tertiary hospital in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of co-created nursing innovations in a Dutch university hospital.JBI evidence implementation · 2025Article
- Impact of Bottom-Up Cocreation of Nursing Technological Innovations: Explorative Interview Study Among Hospital Nurses and Managers.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- A Bibliometric Review of Publications on Innovative Behaviors of Nurse Managers.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- The Nursing Theory of Complex Adaptive Systems: A New Paradigm for Nursing.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enabling nurses' engagement in the design of healthcare technology - Core competencies and requirements: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Leveraging Supervisor Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Organizational Absorptive Capacity on Nurses' Creativity.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses frequently innovate in response to operational failures, regulations, procedures, and/or other workflow barriers that prevent them from delivering high-quality patient care. Unfortunately, most nurse innovations do not diffuse to a broader audience, depriving other nurses from taking advantage of solutions that have already been developed elsewhere. This under-diffusion is problematic from a societal and welfare point of view. The goal of this paper is to understand how diffusion shortage of nurse innovations can be reduced. Methods: We develop a qualitative case study of a medical makerspace at the largest academic hospital in the Netherlands. This medical makerspace reported unusually high rates of nurse innovation diffusion. Our data collection includes on-site observations, archival data, secondary data, and fifteen in-depth interviews with key informants. Qualitative coding procedures and a combination of deductive and inductive reasoning are used to analyze the data. Results: Our data show that personal, organizational, regulatory, and market barriers prevent nurses from further developing and diffusion their innovations in an anticipatory manner. That is, because nurses expect that transforming an initial solution into an innovation that can be shared with others will be too time consuming and difficult they do not proceed with the further development. The medical makerspace that we investigated adequately addresses this problem by developing an innovation ecosystem that largely takes over the innovation and diffusion process. Discussion: We provide a concrete example of how a medical makerspace, and innovation support systems in a broader sense, can be designed to more adequately address the nurse innovation-diffusion gap. The two main elements of the practical solution that we identified are: (1) Support systems should facilitate that others may lead the development and diffusion of innovations and (2) The support system should promote that actors integrate their functional specializations within an innovation ecosystem. We make two theoretical contributions. First, we contribute to understanding barriers in the nurse innovation-diffusion process from a psychological point. Second, we identified that an ecosystem perspective is beneficial to develop innovation support systems in which diffusion occurs more often.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.