Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37601147›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022

Effect of Circular Stapler Diameter on Anastomotic Leakage Rate and Stenosis After Open Total Gastrectomy With Esophagojejunostomy: A Substantive Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Series.

Anke Mittelstädt, Helena Reitberger, Julia Fleischmann, Moustafa Elshafei, Maximilian Brunner, Anna Anthuber, Christian Krautz, Marianna Lucio, Susanne Merkel, Robert Grützmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anke MittelstädtFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Helena ReitbergerFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Julia FleischmannFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Moustafa ElshafeiDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Medicine, Clinic Northwest, Frankfurt, Germany.
Maximilian BrunnerFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Anna AnthuberFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Christian KrautzFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Marianna LucioResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Susanne MerkelFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Robert GrützmannFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Georg F WeberFrom the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) and stenosis (AS) are two of the most severe postoperative complications after total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy. The stapler diameter can be chosen by the surgeon. Therefore, this study aims to assess the correlation between the stapler size as main independent variable as well as other different risk factors and AL and AS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 356 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy between 2000 and 2018, mostly due to gastric cancer (96.9%). After propensity score matching the outcome parameters AL and AS were compared between the two stapler size groups. We also assessed different risk factors for AL and AS in cancer patients using multivariate analysis. Results: Small circular stapler diameter (21/25 mm; n = 147 vs 28/29/31 mm; n = 209) was identified as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of AL (10% vs 4% for smaller vs larger staplers; Conclusion: The application of a larger circular stapler for esophagojejunostomy in open total gastrectomy shows significantly lower rates of AL and stenosis. Therefore, the largest possible stapler diameter should be applied.

Indexed as

anastomosisanastomotic leakageanastomotic stenosisesophagojejunostomygastrectomysurgical stapler

Identifiers

PMID37601147
PMCPMC10431426
OpenAlexW4295066773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.