ArticleSSM - population health2023
Explaining the poor-rich gap in anthropometric failure among children in India: An econometric analysis of the NFHS, 2021 and 2016.
Article in SSM - population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in socioeconomic inequality in mortality during childhood between 1993 and 2021 in India.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Decomposing social groups differential in stunting among children under five in India using nationally representative sample data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An evolution of inequality of opportunity in the nutritional outcomes of under-five children in Malawi.SSM - population health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wealth inequality in anthropometric failure is a persistent concern for policymakers in India. This necessitates a comprehensive analysis and identification of various risk factors that can explain the poor-rich gap in anthropometric failure among children in India. We analyze the fifth and fourth rounds of the Indian National Family Health Survey collected from June 2019 to April 2021 and January 2015 to December 2016, respectively. Two samples of children aged 0-59 and 6-23 months old with singleton birth, alive at the time of the survey with non-pregnant mothers, and with valid data on stunting, severe stunting, underweight, severely underweight, wasting, and severe wasting are included in the analytical samples from both rounds. We estimate the wealth gradients and distribution of wealth among children with anthropometric failure. Wealth gap in anthropometric failure is identified using logistic regression analysis. The contribution of risk factors in explaining the poor-rich gap in AF is estimated by the multivariate decomposition analysis. We observe a negative wealth gradient for each measure of anthropometric failure. Wealth distributions indicate that at least 60% of the population burden of anthropometric failure is among the poor and poorest wealth groups. Even among children with similar modifiable risk factors, children from poor and poorest backgrounds have a higher prevalence of anthropometric failure compared to children from the richest backgrounds. Maternal BMI, exposure to mass media, and access to sanitary facility are the most significant risk factors that explain the poor-rich gap in anthropometric failure. This evidence suggests that the burden of anthropometric failure and its risk factors are unevenly distributed in India. The policy interventions focusing on maternal and child health, implemented with a targeted approach prioritizing the vulnerable groups, can only partially bridge the poor-rich gap in anthropometric failure. The role of anti-poverty programs and growth is essential to narrow this gap in anthropometric failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.