ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2023
A machine learning model for colorectal liver metastasis post-hepatectomy prognostications.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model for 1 year all-cause mortality risk in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after HIFU treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- A Comparison of 11 Clinical Risk Scores for Prediction of Survival After Curative-Intent Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using routine biochemical tests enhanced by machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Explainable AI-based prognostication of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases using preoperative clinical parameters: is it comparable to traditional clinical scoring systems?Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Development of a PANoptosis-Related Pathomics Prognostic Model in Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Omics Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for Mortality and Machine Learning-Based Prediction in Critically Ill Patients with Paralytic Ileus: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Dynamic Prognostic Models for Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Exhaustive Review of the Literature and Future Prospectives.Cancers · 2025Review
- A machine learning-based prediction model for colorectal liver metastasis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting early recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastases: an integrative approach using radiomics and machine learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Outcome prediction after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: out with the old, in with the new?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- A machine learning model for colorectal liver metastasis post-hepatectomy prognostications: several strategies for the model evaluation.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- Review
- Necessity of integrating statistical inference and clinical practice in developing clinical models: bias introduced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma with liver metastases: a population-based cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, surgical resection is the mainstay for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) management and the only potentially curative treatment modality. Prognostication tools can support patient selection for surgical resection to maximize therapeutic benefit. This study aimed to develop a survival prediction model using machine learning based on a multicenter patient sample in Hong Kong. Methods: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018 in four hospitals in Hong Kong were included in the study. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards (CPH). A stepwise selection on Cox multivariable models with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was applied to a multiply-imputed dataset to build a prediction model. The model was validated in the validation set, and its performance was compared with that of Fong Clinical Risk Score (CRS) using concordance index. Results: A total of 572 patients were included with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. The full models for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) consist of the same 8 established and novel variables, namely colorectal cancer nodal stage, CRLM neoadjuvant treatment, Charlson Comorbidity Score, pre-hepatectomy bilirubin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, CRLM largest tumor diameter, extrahepatic metastasis detected on positron emission-tomography (PET)-scan as well as KRAS status. Our CRLM Machine-learning Algorithm Prognostication model (CMAP) demonstrated better ability to predict OS (C-index =0.651), compared with the Fong CRS for 1-year (C-index =0.571) and 5-year OS (C-index =0.574). It also achieved a C-index of 0.651 for RFS. Conclusions: We present a promising machine learning algorithm to individualize prognostications for patients following resection of CRLM with good discriminative ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.