ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023
Analysis of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis after spinal infection surgery and construction of a nomogram preoperative prediction model.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caprini score combined with thrombotic molecular markers for predicting DVT in patients with traumatic fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nomogram based on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the occurrence of preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- The correlation between coagulation biomarkers, bone turnover markers, and bone mineral density in Chinese adults aged ≥ 50 years.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
- Predicting the Risk of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Elderly Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Seven Machine Learning Models.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the differences in postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between patients with spinal infection and those with non-infected spinal disease; to construct a clinical prediction model using patients' preoperative clinical information and routine laboratory indicators to predict the likelihood of DVT after surgery. Method: According to the inclusion criteria, 314 cases of spinal infection (SINF) and 314 cases of non-infected spinal disease (NSINF) were collected from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021 at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and the differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative DVT were analyzed by chi-square test. The spinal infection cases were divided into a thrombotic group (DVT) and a non-thrombotic group (NDVT) according to whether they developed DVT after surgery. Pre-operative clinical information and routine laboratory indicators of patients in the DVT and NDVT groups were used to compare the differences between groups for each variable, and variables with predictive significance were screened out by least absolute shrinkage and operator selection (LASSO) regression analysis, and a predictive model and nomogram of postoperative DVT was established using multi-factor logistic regression, with a Hosmer- Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to plot the calibration curve of the model, and the predictive effect of the model was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Result: The incidence of postoperative DVT in patients with spinal infection was 28%, significantly higher than 16% in the NSINF group, and statistically different from the NSINF group (P < 0.000). Five predictor variables for postoperative DVT in patients with spinal infection were screened by LASSO regression, and plotted as a nomogram. Calibration curves showed that the model was a good fit. The AUC of the predicted model was 0.8457 in the training cohort and 0.7917 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: In this study, a nomogram prediction model was developed for predicting postoperative DVT in patients with spinal infection. The nomogram included five preoperative predictor variables, which would effectively predict the likelihood of DVT after spinal infection and may have greater clinical value for the treatment and prevention of postoperative DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.