ArticleBioactive materials2023
Preclinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of a new bioartificial cornea.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Corneal Hydrogels: From Passive Replacement to Active Regeneration and Intelligent Interaction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Decellularized corneal-based 3D scaffolds: methods decellularization, characterization, mechanical properties, and species source.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Reconstruction of deep and perforating corneal defects in dogs-A review (Part II/III): Biomaterials and keratoprosthesis.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Targeting limbal epithelial stem cells: master conductors of corneal epithelial regeneration from the bench to multilevel theranostics.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Biopolymer-Based Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Chemical, Physical, and Biological Corneal Decellularization Methods: A Review of Literature.Journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-linking agents are frequently used to restore corneal properties after decellularization, and it is especially important to select an appropriate method to avoid excessive cross-linking. In addition, how to promote wound healing and how to improve scar formation require further investigation. To ensure the safety and efficacy of animal-derived products, we designed bioartificial corneas (BACs) according to the criteria for Class III medical devices. Our BACs do not require cross-linking agents and increase mechanical strength via self-cross-linking of aldehyde-modified hyaluronic acid (AHA) and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) on the surface of decellularized porcine corneas (DPCs). The results showed that the BACs had good biocompatibility and transparency, and the modification enhanced their antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties in vitro. Preclinical animal studies showed that the BACs can rapidly regenerate the epithelium and restore vision within a month. After 3 months, the BACs were gradually filled with epithelial, stromal, and neuronal cells, and after 6 months, their transparency and histology were almost normal. In addition, side effects such as corneal neovascularization, conjunctival hyperemia, and ciliary body hyperemia rarely occur in vivo. Therefore, these BACs show promise for clinical application for the treatment of infectious corneal ulcers and as a temporary covering for corneal perforations to achieve the more time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.