ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2023
Oral Corticosteroid Reduction Between Biologics Initiated and Non-Initiated Patients with Severe Asthma.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05136547 (Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Biologics vs Usual Treatment on OCS Reduction for Severe Asthma Patients Using Health Insurance Claim Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Biologics vs Usual Treatment on OCS Reduction for Severe Asthma Patients Using Health Insurance Claim Database
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unknotting the nexus of asthma and neuroinflammation: from brain network alterations to therapeutic implications.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- State of art of oral corticosteroids in children with acute asthma and wheezing.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Clinical Remission in Severe Asthma: A Comparative Analysis of Patients with and Without Biologics from the Swiss Severe Asthma Registry.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Clinical Remission in Best-Performing Severe Asthmatic Patients Treated for Three Years with Mepolizumab.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Degree of Adherence to Recommendations From the Spanish Consensus on the Reduction of Oral Corticosteroid Use in Asthma Patients: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing effect of several biologics (BIOs) has been shown in clinical trials. To date, no study has evaluated differences in OCS dose reduction between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated patients in real-world clinical practice. We compared dose reductions in maintenance OCS between BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated severe asthma patients in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database of Medical Data Vision in Japan. Severe asthma patients with continuous use of OCS were selected from December 2015 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was the proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose from Week 0 to Week 24. Analyses were performed using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: In total, 2927 patients were included (BIO-initiated: 239 patients, BIO-non-initiated: 2688 patients). Adjusted median (quartile [Q] 1-Q3) proportion reduction in daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 from the index date was 25.0% (0.0-100.0%) and 0.0% (0.0-83.3%) in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups, respectively (Hodges-Lehmann estimate [95% confidence interval], 0.0000% [0.0000-0.3365%]). Respective proportions of patients in the BIO-initiated and BIO-non-initiated groups achieving dose reductions from the index date in the daily maintenance OCS dose at Week 24 were >0% reduction, 56.6% and 44.1% (odds ratio [OR] 1.6554); ≥25% reduction, 50.5% and 40.6% (OR 1.4888); ≥50% reduction, 42.8% and 33.7% (OR 1.4714); and 100% reduction, 26.2% and 24.4% (OR 1.1005). Conclusion: Among severe asthma patients, the daily dose of maintenance OCS was reduced with BIO treatment. Although a higher percentage of patients in the BIO-initiated group had an OCS reduction of ≤75% than the BIO-non-initiated group, we found no clear difference in OCS reduction. Our findings will be justified by further research that incorporates a longer observation period and variables excluded from this study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05136547).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.