Histologic Comparison of the Fascicular Area of Processed Nerve Allograft Versus Cabled Sural Nerve Autograft.

Background: The use of multiple cables of sural nerve autograft is common for peripheral nerve reconstruction when injured nerve caliber exceeds the nerve graft caliber. Although the optimal matching of neural to nonneural elements and its association with functional outcomes are unknown, it is reasonable to consider maximizing the neural tissue structure available for nerve regeneration. No prior studies have compared directly the cross-sectional fascicular area between cabled nerve autografts and size-selected nerve allografts. This study evaluated the cross-sectional fascicular area between native nerve stumps and two reconstructive nerve grafting methods: cabled sural nerve autograft (CSNA) and processed nerve allograft (PNA). Methods: CSNA from matched cadaveric specimens and PNA were used to reconstruct nerve defects in the median and ulnar nerves of six pairs of cadaveric specimens. Nerve reconstructions were done by fellowship-trained hand surgeons. The total nerve area, fascicular area, and nonfascicular area were measured histologically. Results: The CSNA grafts had significantly less fascicular area than PNA and caliber-matched native nerve. The PNA grafts had a significantly higher percent fascicular area compared with the intercalary CNSA graft. Conclusions: Fascicular area was significantly greater in PNA versus CSNA. The PNA consistently demonstrated a match in fascicular area closer to the native nerve stumps than CSNA, where CSNA had significantly smaller fascicular area compared with native nerve stumps.