Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600800›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2023

Safety and immunogenicity of rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthy adolescents: an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, phase 1/2, dose-escalation study.

Amir I Tukhvatulin, Inna V Dolzhikova, Alina S Dzharullaeva, Daria M Grousova, Anna V Kovyrshina, Olga V Zubkova, Ilya D Zorkov, Anna A Iliukhina, Artem Y Shelkov, Alina S Erokhova and 18 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04954092 (An Open Label Study With an Open Dose Selection Period to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Drug "Gam-COVID-Vac, a Combined Vector Vaccine for the Prevention of Coronavirus Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Virus", With the Participation of Adolescent Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04954092 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

An Open Label Study With an Open Dose Selection Period to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of the Drug "Gam-COVID-Vac, a Combined Vector Vaccine for the Prevention of Coronavirus Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Virus", With the Participation of Adolescent Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorGamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Health Ministry of the Russian FederationRan2021 to 2023Enrolled3,000ConditionsCovid19, Vaccine Preventable DiseaseArmsGam-COVID-vac M, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The immunogenicity and safety of adenoviral-based vaccines.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Developing the next-generation of adenoviral vector vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amir I TukhvatulinFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Inna V DolzhikovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Alina S DzharullaevaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Daria M GrousovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Anna V KovyrshinaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Olga V ZubkovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Ilya D ZorkovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Anna A IliukhinaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Artem Y ShelkovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Alina S ErokhovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Olga PopovaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana A OzharovskaiaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Denis I ZrelkinFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Fatima M IzhaevaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry V ShcheblyakovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Ilias B EsmagambetovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Elisaveta A TokarskayaFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia A NikitenkoFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Nadezhda L LubenetsFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta A KhadorichFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir A GushchinFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Svetlana N BorzakovaChildren's City Clinical Hospital named after Z. A. Bashlyaeva, Moscow City Health Department, Moscow, Russia.
Anna V VlasovaMorozov Children's City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russia.
Ismail M OsmanovChildren's City Clinical Hospital named after Z. A. Bashlyaeva, Moscow City Health Department, Moscow, Russia.
Valerii V GorevMorozov Children's City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russia.
Boris S NaroditskyFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Denis Y LogunovFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander L GintsburgFederal State Budget Institution "National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named After Honorary Academician N. F. Gamaleya", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUCity Clinical Hospital · RURussian Children's Clinical Hospital · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To protect young individuals against SARS-CoV-2 infection, we conducted an open-label, prospective, non-randomised dose-escalation Phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the prime-boost "Sputnik V" vaccine administered at 1/10 and 1/5 doses to adolescents aged 12-17 years. The study began with the vaccination of the older cohort (15-to-17-year-old participants) with the lower (1/10) dose of vaccine and then expanded to the whole group (12-to-17-year-old participants). Next, 1/5 dose was used according to the same scheme. Both doses were well tolerated by all age groups. No serious or severe adverse events were detected. Most of the solicited adverse reactions were mild. No significant differences in total frequencies of adverse events were registered between low and high doses in age-pooled groups (69.6% versus 66.7%). In contrast, the 1/5 dose induced significantly higher humoral and T cell-mediated immune responses than the 1/10 dose. The 1/5 vaccine dose elicited higher antigen-binding (both S and RBD-specific) as well as virus-neutralising antibody titres at the maximum of response (day 42), also resulting in a statistically significant difference at a distanced timepoint (day 180) compared to the 1/10 vaccine dose. Higher dose resulted in increased cross-neutralization of Delta and Omicron variants. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04954092, LP-007632.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentChildHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SpermineVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19 VaccinesdioctadecylamidospermineGam-COVID-Vac vaccineSpermineVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19Gam-COVID-VacSARS-CoV-2Sputnik MSputnik V

Identifiers

PMID37600800
PMCPMC10432829
OpenAlexW4385462818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.