ArticleJPGN reports2023
Gluten-Free Diet Knowledge and Adherence in Adolescents with Celiac Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JPGN reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess Disease-Related Knowledge in Children with Coeliac Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Mediterranean diet-based nutritional intervention on gluten-free diet, nutritional status, and quality of life in a pediatric celiac population: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Malignancies in Celiac Disease-A Hidden Threat with Diagnostic Pitfalls.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Assessment of Gluten-Free Products' Availability and Satisfaction in a Polish Population of Coeliac Disease Patients and Their Caregivers.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Knowledge Gaps in Gluten-Free Diet Awareness among Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Call for Enhanced Nutritional Education.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Commentary: Knowledge as necessary but not sufficient for improving self-management in pediatric chronic illness.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the relationship between knowledge of, and adherence to, the gluten-free diet (GFD) in a local population of adolescents with celiac disease (CD). The secondary objectives were to identify information sources used to learn about the GFD and to compare adolescents' and parents' knowledge of the GFD. Methods: Adolescents (12-17 years) with CD and their parents from pediatric gastroenterology clinics in Calgary, Alberta, completed an online survey containing a knowledge assessment (Gluten-Free Diet Quiz [GFD-Q]), an adherence scale, questions about GFD information sources, and demographic/clinical information. GFD-Q scores were deemed "sufficient knowledge" with correct identification of 3/3 gluten-containing foods, ≥4/7 gluten-free foods, and ≥ 4/7 foods that may contain gluten; otherwise, scores were termed "insufficient knowledge". Results: Of the 40 adolescent-parent pairs, 15 of 40 adolescents (37%) had sufficient knowledge, and 25 of 40 adolescents (63%) had insufficient knowledge. Within the insufficient knowledge group, 14 of 25 (56%) did not correctly identify enough allowed gluten-free foods. Parents scored higher on the GFD-Q (67% had sufficient knowledge). Adolescents reported overall adherence to the GFD (88%), with adherence being similar between the sufficient and insufficient knowledge groups (80% versus 92%). The most helpful information sources included physicians, another person with CD, parent(s), and Google; apps were infrequently used. Conclusion: Adolescents report good adherence; however, they struggle with GFD knowledge, particularly in identifying gluten-free foods. Further research is required to explore GFD educational tools, including mobile apps and dietician-led teaching sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.