Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600553›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Artificial intelligence in the autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions: a systematic review.

Harry Robertshaw, Lennart Karstensen, Benjamin Jackson, Hadi Sadati, Kawal Rhode, Sebastien Ourselin, Alejandro Granados, Thomas C Booth

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Toward real-time autonomous navigation: transformer-based catheter tip tracking in fluoroscopy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Benchmarking reinforcement learning algorithms for autonomous mechanical thrombectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harry RobertshawSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lennart KarstensenFraunhofer IPA, Mannheim, Germany.
Benjamin JacksonSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hadi SadatiSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kawal RhodeSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alejandro GranadosSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas C BoothSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W021684/1Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in endovascular interventional surgery can decrease operation times, improve decision-making during surgery, and reduce operator radiation exposure while increasing access to treatment. Objective: To determine from recent literature, through a systematic review, the impact, challenges, and opportunities artificial intelligence (AI) has for the autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires for endovascular interventions. Methods: PubMed and IEEEXplore databases were searched to identify reports of AI applied to autonomous navigation methods in endovascular interventional surgery. Eligibility criteria included studies investigating the use of AI in enabling the autonomous navigation of catheters/guidewires in endovascular interventions. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), articles were assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). PROSPERO: CRD42023392259. Results: Four hundred and sixty-two studies fulfilled the search criteria, of which 14 studies were included for analysis. Reinforcement learning (RL) (9/14, 64%) and learning from expert demonstration (7/14, 50%) were used as data-driven models for autonomous navigation. These studies evaluated models on physical phantoms (10/14, 71%) and Conclusion: Despite the potential benefits of AI applied to autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions, the field is in an experimental proof-of-concept stage, with a technology readiness level of 3. We highlight that reference standards with well-identified performance metrics are crucial to allow for comparisons of data-driven algorithms proposed in the years to come. Systematic review registration: identifier: CRD42023392259.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautonomyendovascular interventionmachine learningnavigation

Identifiers

PMID37600553
PMCPMC10438983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.