SynthesisFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Artificial intelligence in the autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends and emerging frontiers in robot-assisted vascular intervention: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Toward autonomous robotic-assisted and microrobotic surgery.Science advances · 2026Review
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Toward real-time autonomous navigation: transformer-based catheter tip tracking in fluoroscopy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- A Position Statement on Endovascular Models and Effectiveness Metrics for Mechanical Thrombectomy Navigation, on Behalf of the Stakeholder Taskforce for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Robotic Thrombectomy (START).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- Different Approaches to Extracting Proximally Migrated or Broken and Retained Pancreatic Stents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Benchmarking reinforcement learning algorithms for autonomous mechanical thrombectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Reinforcement learning for safe autonomous two-device navigation of cerebral vessels in mechanical thrombectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Systems in Cardiovascular Interventions: Evolving Platforms and the Path Forward.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Towards autonomous robot-assisted transcatheter heart valve implantation: in vivo teleoperation and phantom validation of AI-guided positioning.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- AI solutions for overcoming delays in telesurgery and telementoring to enhance surgical practice and education.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in endovascular interventional surgery can decrease operation times, improve decision-making during surgery, and reduce operator radiation exposure while increasing access to treatment. Objective: To determine from recent literature, through a systematic review, the impact, challenges, and opportunities artificial intelligence (AI) has for the autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires for endovascular interventions. Methods: PubMed and IEEEXplore databases were searched to identify reports of AI applied to autonomous navigation methods in endovascular interventional surgery. Eligibility criteria included studies investigating the use of AI in enabling the autonomous navigation of catheters/guidewires in endovascular interventions. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), articles were assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). PROSPERO: CRD42023392259. Results: Four hundred and sixty-two studies fulfilled the search criteria, of which 14 studies were included for analysis. Reinforcement learning (RL) (9/14, 64%) and learning from expert demonstration (7/14, 50%) were used as data-driven models for autonomous navigation. These studies evaluated models on physical phantoms (10/14, 71%) and Conclusion: Despite the potential benefits of AI applied to autonomous navigation of endovascular interventions, the field is in an experimental proof-of-concept stage, with a technology readiness level of 3. We highlight that reference standards with well-identified performance metrics are crucial to allow for comparisons of data-driven algorithms proposed in the years to come. Systematic review registration: identifier: CRD42023392259.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.