ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk-Benefit of Phase 2 Monotherapy Trials in Adult Solid Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A system review of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade for breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of immunotherapeutic strategies in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery - what it is, where we stand and the path forward.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Mutation of rearranged during transfection (RET) is associated with enhanced tumor immunogenicity and favorable outcomes in pan-cancer immunotherapy.The oncologist · 2026Article
- FGFR1 copy number gain is independently associated with shorter progression-free survival in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Overall survival of recurrent/metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma patients progressing after ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy, treated with MVX-ONCO-1, a novel, first in class cell encapsulation-based immunotherapy: results of SAKK 11/16, a phase IIa trial.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Dual-energy CT iodine concentration as a biomarker for immunotherapy treatment response in metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients.European radiology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the TCR Repertoire in Bone Marrow CD8European journal of immunology · 2025Article
- Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer trials: a correlation meta-analysis.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
- Frequently asked questions on surrogate endpoints in oncology-opportunities, pitfalls, and the way forward.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- The association of ROS1 mutation with cancer immunity and its impact on the efficacy of pan-cancer immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Bifidobacterium modulation of tumor immunotherapy and its mechanism.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Review
- Sex disparities revealed by single-cell and bulk sequencing and their impacts on the efficacy of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.Biology of sex differences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer immunotherapy shows unique efficacy kinetics that differs from conventional treatment. These characteristics may lead to the prolongation of trial duration, hence reliable surrogate endpoints are urgently needed. We aimed to systematically evaluate the study-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in cancer immunotherapy. Methods: We searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, between database inception and October 18, 2022, for phase 3 randomised trials investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. An updated search was done on July, 15, 2023. No language restrictions were used. Eligible trials had to set overall survival (OS) as the primary or co-primary endpoint and report at least one intermediate clinical endpoint including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria included: (1) adult patients (>18 years old) with advanced solid tumour; (2) no immunotherapy conducted in the control arms; (3) follow-up is long enough to achieve OS; (4) data should be public available. A two-stage meta-analytic approach was conducted to evaluate the magnitude of the association between these intermediate endpoints and OS. A surrogate was identified if the coefficient of determination (R Findings: 52,342 patients with 15 types of tumours from 77 phase 3 studies were included. ORR (R Interpretation: 1-year milestone survival was the only identified surrogacy endpoint for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy. Ongoing investigations and development of new endpoints and incorporation of biomarkers are needed to identify potential surrogate markers that can be more robust than 1-year survival. This work may provide important references in assisting the design and interpretation of future clinical trials, and constitute complementary information in drafting clinical practice guidelines. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.